Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive vs Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive leads on support and fit.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers better support and value, while the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 is lighter and more cushioned.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
Price
Brooks is $98.95 compared to Hoka's $122.49.
Support
Brooks features Guiderails for enhanced stability.
Sales Rank
Brooks has a better sales rank at 1047.
Why Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium is better
Weight
Hoka is designed to be lightweight for daily training.
Cushioning
Hoka offers cloud-like cushioning with upgraded foam.
Fit
Hoka has a more foot-hugging fit.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive | Hoka Women's Rincon 4 Black/Black 9 Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | HOKA |
| Model | Adrenaline GTS 24 | Rincon 4 |
| Cushion Type | DNA Loft v3 | Upgraded Foam |
| Upper Material | Air Mesh | Double Jacquard |
| Support System | Guiderails | Active Foot Frame |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is a supportive running shoe designed for comfort and stability. Priced at $98.95, it is about 19% cheaper than its competitor, the Hoka Women's Rincon 4, which retails for $122.49. With a sales rank of 1047, this shoe has gained popularity among runners seeking reliable performance.
The Adrenaline GTS 24 features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, offering a plush feel while adapting to individual strides. The innovative Guiderails Holistic Support System promotes natural movement, making it suitable for those who need additional support. Additionally, it boasts a breathable engineered air mesh upper for enhanced comfort.
Overview of the Hoka Women's Rincon 4
The Hoka Women's Rincon 4 is marketed as a lightweight running shoe, emphasizing its cloud-like cushioning. This model is priced at $122.49, making it 19% more expensive than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24. With a sales rank of 17234, it caters to a different segment of runners looking for a lighter option for daily training.
The Rincon 4 features an upgraded foam that enhances both rebound and longevity, ensuring a soft feel on every run. Its durable podular outsole design and a more foot-hugging fit contribute to a comfortable experience. The shoe also incorporates a two-layer midsole and an early-stage MetaRocker, which aids in smoother transitions and efficiency during runs.
Comfort and Cushioning Comparison
In terms of comfort and cushioning, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 excels with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning. This technology is designed to provide a soft and adaptive feel, promoting a smooth ride mile after mile. For runners who prioritize plush cushioning, this shoe stands out.
On the other hand, the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 offers an impressive cloud-weight cushion that aims to deliver softness without adding bulk. Its upgraded foam is engineered for better rebound, making it a strong contender for those who desire a lightweight option. While both shoes offer excellent cushioning, the Brooks may appeal to those who prefer a more supportive structure, while the Hoka is ideal for runners seeking a featherlight experience.
Support and Stability Features
Support and stability are crucial for many runners, and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 shines in this area with its Guiderails Holistic Support System. This feature helps to keep excess movement in check, allowing runners to maintain their natural motion path. This is particularly beneficial for those who may require additional support during runs.
In contrast, the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 focuses on a lightweight design, which may sacrifice some stability features. While it does include an Active Foot Frame that supports the rear foot, it does not provide the same level of structured support as the Brooks. Therefore, runners looking for maximum stability may prefer the Brooks model.
Durability and Longevity
When it comes to durability, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is built to withstand the demands of regular running. Its engineered air mesh upper not only enhances breathability but also contributes to the shoe's overall durability, ensuring it can hold up over time.
The Hoka Women's Rincon 4, known for its lightweight design, has also been engineered for longevity. The upgraded foam and rubberized EVA outsole work together to ensure that the shoe remains functional even after extensive use. However, the focus on lightweight materials may lead some runners to question its long-term durability compared to the more robust construction of the Brooks.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes in a sleek Black/Black/Ebony colorway that appeals to a wide range of runners. Its refined aesthetic is complemented by functional features that enhance performance.
The Hoka Women's Rincon 4 also sports a stylish Black/Black color scheme. However, the design leans more towards a sporty look that emphasizes its lightweight nature. While both shoes are visually appealing, the choice may come down to personal preference regarding style and how the shoes complement an outfit.
Price and Value Analysis
The price difference between the two models is significant, with the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 at $98.95 and the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 at $122.49. This makes the Brooks approximately 19% cheaper, providing a compelling value for those on a budget.
Considering the features, the Brooks offers excellent cushioning and support, making it a strong value proposition for runners seeking stability. Conversely, the Hoka may justify its higher price through its advanced lightweight technology and comfort, catering to those who prioritize these aspects.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 and the Hoka Women's Rincon 4 ultimately hinges on individual preferences and running needs. If you prioritize support, stability, and a more traditional running shoe feel, the Brooks is the ideal choice, especially given its lower price point. However, if you are seeking a lightweight shoe that offers a cushioned experience for daily training, the Hoka may be worth the additional investment. Consider your running style, budget, and comfort preferences when making your decision.

