vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive wins on price and support, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe wins on versatility.

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 offers superior support and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 is a more budget-friendly and versatile option.

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better

Support

Brooks features Guiderails for enhanced stability.

Cushioning

Brooks uses nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 for plush comfort.

Certification

Brooks is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe is better

Price

New Balance is approximately 29% cheaper.

Versatility

New Balance is suitable for various activities.

Weight

New Balance is lighter and designed for casual use.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
75

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 SupportiveNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe
BrandBrooksNew Balance
ModelAdrenaline GTS 24Fresh Foam 680 V8
Cushioning TypeDNA Loft v3Fresh Foam
Upper MaterialAir MeshKnit
WeightLightweightLightweight

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 SupportiveNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is priced at $98.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 V8 is available for $69.99, making it approximately 29% cheaper. This significant price difference can influence budget-conscious shoppers leaning towards the New Balance option. While Brooks offers advanced features in support and cushioning, the New Balance shoe provides excellent value for those looking for a more economical choice without sacrificing comfort.

Comfort and Cushioning

Both shoes prioritize comfort, but they achieve it differently. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which delivers lightweight and plush comfort for each stride. This shoe is designed to support runners through smooth transitions, ensuring a comfortable experience mile after mile. On the other hand, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 utilizes a Fresh Foam midsole with about 3% bio-based content, offering an ultra-cushioned ride. While both shoes are designed for comfort, the Brooks model targets those needing additional support during long runs, whereas the New Balance caters to casual runners and everyday use.

Support Features

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 stands out with its Guiderails Holistic Support System, which helps to maintain natural motion and reduce unnecessary movement. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who may overpronate or require extra stability. In contrast, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 does not specifically highlight additional support features, focusing more on comfort and lightness. For those prioritizing stability and support during their runs, the Brooks shoe is the clear winner.

Breathability and Fit

In terms of breathability, the Brooks shoe is equipped with an engineered air mesh upper that balances ventilation and structure, ensuring a comfortable fit. This design allows for adequate airflow, which is crucial during longer runs. Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 features a precision-engineered knit upper that promotes targeted ventilation and a sleek fit due to its no-sew construction. While both shoes emphasize comfort and fit, the Brooks option may provide a slight edge in breathability due to its structured mesh.

Durability and Build Quality

Both shoes boast durability, but their construction methods differ. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, which speaks to its quality and the attention given to its build. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8 is built with an integrated rubber outsole designed to enhance underfoot comfort. Overall, while both models are durable, the Brooks shoe's certification suggests a level of build quality that might appeal to more serious runners requiring reliable footwear for long distances.

Versatility

The versatility of each shoe can greatly influence a purchase decision. The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 is designed for serious runners, offering features that cater specifically to those who run longer distances or need extra support. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 V8, however, is marketed for various activities, including running, workouts, and even casual errands. With its lightweight design and comfortable fit, it suits a broader range of users, making it more versatile for everyday use.

Style and Aesthetics

Style may play a role in your decision, and both shoes present appealing designs. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes in a sleek black color, making it a versatile option that can match various athletic outfits. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 V8 also features a modern design, focusing on a streamlined appearance with a knit upper. Both models look great, but personal preference will ultimately guide your choice in aesthetics.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 V8 largely depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize advanced support and cushioning for longer runs, the Brooks option may be the better choice, albeit at a higher price point. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly, versatile shoe suitable for various activities, the New Balance model is an excellent option. Ultimately, both shoes have their strengths, catering to different types of runners and activities.