Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive vs New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive wins on support and cushioning, New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running wins on style and weight.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers superior comfort and support at a lower price, making it the better choice for long-distance runners. The New Balance Women’s FuelCell Rebel V5 is more versatile but comes at a higher cost.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
Price
$98.95 vs $144.95
Support
Guiderails Holistic Support System vs no specific stability features
Comfort
Nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 vs FuelCell technology
Why New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running is better
Versatility
Designed for various activities vs primarily for long-distance running
Design
More vibrant colorway vs classic black color scheme
Weight
Ultra-light bonded support vs heavier cushioning
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive | New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | DNA Loft v3 | FuelCell |
| Upper Material | Air Mesh | Streamlined Mesh |
| Sales Rank | 1047 | 24349 |
| Weight | Lightweight | Moderate |
| Stability | High | Low |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is priced at $98.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the New Balance Women’s FuelCell Rebel V5, which costs $144.95. This price difference could be significant for budget-conscious buyers or those looking to get the most value for their money. The Adrenaline GTS 24 not only offers a lower price but also comes with a solid reputation, as indicated by its bestseller rank of 1047. In contrast, the FuelCell Rebel V5 has a higher sales rank of 24349, which may suggest that it is less popular among consumers.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort and cushioning, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 excels with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 midsole foam, designed to provide lightweight and plush comfort for long runs. This feature allows the shoe to adapt to your unique stride, ensuring a smooth experience mile after mile. On the other hand, the New Balance Women’s FuelCell Rebel V5 utilizes FuelCell technology to deliver a propulsive feel, which is ideal for more dynamic and varied running styles. While both shoes focus on comfort, the Adrenaline GTS 24 is particularly suited for longer distances, making it a better choice for endurance runners.
Support Features
Support is a major highlight for the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, which incorporates a Guiderails Holistic Support System. This innovative technology helps maintain natural motion while preventing excess movement, making it a solid option for runners who require extra stability. The FuelCell Rebel V5, while featuring a FantomFit upper for lightweight support, does not specifically emphasize stability, focusing more on a responsive feel. Runners with specific support needs may find the Adrenaline GTS 24 to be the more suitable option.
Breathability
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features an engineered air mesh upper, providing excellent breathability, stretch, and structure for a comfortable fit. This design is crucial for keeping your feet cool during long runs, especially in warmer weather. In comparison, the New Balance Women’s FuelCell Rebel V5 also includes a streamlined mesh upper, but it focuses more on race-inspired accents than on breathability features. Both shoes offer adequate ventilation, but the Adrenaline GTS 24 may have a slight edge thanks to its specifically designed upper for comfort.
Versatility
In terms of versatility, the New Balance Women’s FuelCell Rebel V5 is designed for a variety of activities beyond just running, making it a more adaptable choice for those who engage in different sports. Its propulsive feel allows for quick transitions from steady runs to spontaneous bursts of speed. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is primarily tailored for supportive long-distance running, which may limit its appeal for cross-training or varied athletic activities. If you’re looking for a shoe that can handle multiple types of workouts, the FuelCell Rebel V5 may be the better option.
Design Aesthetics
Aesthetically, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes in a sleek black color scheme, which gives it a classic and versatile look suitable for various athletic outfits. The New Balance Women’s FuelCell Rebel V5, on the other hand, features a more vibrant colorway of linen and grey matter, appealing to those who prefer a more modern and energetic design. While design preference is subjective, the Adrenaline GTS 24’s more understated look may appeal to traditionalists, while the FuelCell Rebel V5 could draw in younger, trend-focused consumers.
Brand Reputation
Brooks has built a strong reputation in the running community, particularly for its focus on comfort and support, as evidenced by the Adrenaline GTS 24’s certification as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and the APMA Seal of Acceptance. New Balance is also a well-known brand, but the FuelCell Rebel V5 ranks lower in sales compared to the Adrenaline GTS 24, which could indicate that it has yet to establish a comparable level of trust among consumers. If brand reputation is a deciding factor for you, the Brooks offering may have the upper hand.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, if you prioritize comfort, support, and a reputable brand, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is the clear winner, especially at its price of $98.95. Its features cater well to long-distance runners and those needing extra stability. However, if you’re looking for a versatile shoe that can adapt to various activities and you don’t mind spending more, the New Balance Women’s FuelCell Rebel V5 may be the better fit at $144.95. Ultimately, your choice should align with your specific running needs and preferences.

