Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive vs Nike Women's Pegasus 41 White/White/Pure
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive leads on support and fit.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers better support and a lower price, while the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 provides a lightweight and responsive ride.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
Price
Brooks is $98.95, Nike is $111.67
Support
Brooks features Guiderails for stability
Sales Rank
Brooks has a rank of 1047, Nike is 29992
Why Nike Women's Pegasus 41 White/White/Pure is better
Weight
Nike is lighter due to improved mesh
Cushioning
Nike offers responsive ReactX foam
Aesthetic
Nike has a modern color scheme
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive | Nike Women's Pegasus 41 White/White/Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | DNA Loft v3 | ReactX foam |
| Support System | Guiderails | None |
| Upper Material | Air mesh | Engineered mesh |
| Durability | PDAC A5500 | Standard |
| Color Options | Black/Black/Ebony | White/White/Pure Platinum |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is priced at $98.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the Nike Women's Pegasus 41, which retails for $111.67. This price difference might appeal to budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes without overspending. The Brooks model not only offers a lower price but also has a solid sales rank of 1047, indicating its popularity among buyers. In contrast, the Nike model has a significantly lower sales rank of 29992, suggesting that it may not be as favored in the marketplace.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, both models boast advanced cushioning technologies, but they approach it differently. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which is designed to provide lightweight, plush comfort. This technology adapts to your unique stride, ensuring that each step feels smooth and comfortable. On the other hand, the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 utilizes ReactX foam and dual Air Zoom units for responsive cushioning. This setup aims to offer an energized ride, particularly beneficial for everyday road running. While both shoes emphasize comfort, Brooks engineers their cushioning for a soft, smooth experience, while Nike focuses on energy return and responsiveness.
Support and Stability
Support is a key feature in the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, thanks to its Guiderails Holistic Support System. This innovative technology helps keep your body in its natural motion path while minimizing excess movement. This makes it a suitable choice for runners who need additional support during their runs. Conversely, the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 does not specifically highlight stability features in its description, focusing instead on breathability and energy return. Therefore, if you prioritize support in your running shoes, the Brooks model is the clear winner in this category.
Breathability and Fit
Both models feature engineered mesh uppers aimed at providing breathability, but they differ in design and purpose. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is designed with an air mesh upper that offers just the right amount of stretch and structure for a comfortable fit. This ensures adequate airflow while maintaining support. Meanwhile, the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 emphasizes an improved engineered mesh that decreases weight and increases overall breathability. If you run in warmer conditions, you may appreciate the lighter, more breathable design of the Nike model, although the Brooks shoe also offers a reliable fit.
Durability
Durability is essential for running shoes, and both models are constructed to withstand regular use. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 has been certified as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, which speaks to its quality and design aimed at longevity. This certification implies that the shoe has passed rigorous testing for durability and support. The Nike Women's Pegasus 41, while not explicitly mentioned in terms of durability certifications, is built for everyday road running, suggesting it can handle frequent wear. However, without specific durability claims, the Brooks model may hold a slight edge in this aspect.
Aesthetic Appeal
When it comes to aesthetics, personal preference plays a significant role. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is available in a sleek Black/Black/Ebony color scheme, offering a classic look suitable for various outfits. In contrast, the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 features a brighter White/White/Pure Platinum/Metallic Silver palette, which may appeal to those looking for a more modern and sporty appearance. Both styles offer versatility, but your choice will ultimately come down to which color scheme aligns better with your personal style.
Performance for Different Running Styles
Both shoes cater to different running styles, making them suitable for various types of runners. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is particularly beneficial for those who need extra support and stability during their runs; its Guiderails system is designed to assist with natural motion. Alternatively, the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 is ideal for runners who prioritize a lightweight feel and responsiveness, thanks to its ReactX foam and Air Zoom technology. Depending on your running style, one shoe may serve your needs better than the other.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 and the Nike Women's Pegasus 41 ultimately depends on your specific running needs and preferences. If you value support, durability, and a lower price point of $98.95, the Brooks model is an excellent choice. It offers advanced cushioning and a solid reputation for comfort and stability. However, if you're looking for a lightweight shoe with responsive cushioning for everyday running and don’t mind paying a premium at $111.67, the Nike option could be more appealing. Evaluate your priorities—whether it’s support, price, or performance—to make the best choice for your running experience.

