Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive vs Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive leads on support and fit.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 excels in support and comfort, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 offers a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
Support
Brooks features Guiderails Holistic Support System.
Cushioning
Brooks has nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Sales Rank
Brooks has a higher sales rank at 1047.
Why Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, is better
Price
Nike is priced at $85.00, making it cheaper.
Weight
Nike is lighter for casual use.
Design
Nike features a stylish heel overlay.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive | Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Nike |
| Model | Adrenaline GTS 24 | Run Swift 3 |
| Cushion Type | DNA Loft v3 | Foam |
| Support Type | Guiderails | Flywire |
| Weight | Light | Lighter |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is priced at $98.95, while the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 is more budget-friendly at $85.00. This makes the Nike option about 14% cheaper than the Brooks shoe. For those who are price-sensitive or looking for a cost-effective choice, the Nike shoe may be appealing. However, the Brooks shoe's price reflects its advanced features and support technology, which may justify the higher cost for serious runners or those needing more specialized footwear.
Comfort Features
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which adapts to your unique stride for plush comfort. This technology allows for a soft, smooth cushioning experience mile after mile. In contrast, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 utilizes foam cushioning that provides a softer underfoot feel but lacks the advanced adaptive technology found in the Brooks shoe. While both shoes aim to enhance comfort, the Brooks model's dynamic cushioning could be a deciding factor for runners prioritizing long-distance comfort.
Support and Stability
Support is a significant differentiator between these two models. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features the Guiderails Holistic Support System, designed to keep your body aligned during runs by managing excess movement. This system is particularly beneficial for those who may overpronate or need additional support. Conversely, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 incorporates Flywire cables for foot security and stability but does not offer the same level of holistic support as the Brooks shoe. Runners who require enhanced support might find the Brooks option more suitable for their needs.
Design and Breathability
In terms of design, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 has an engineered air mesh upper, which provides breathable comfort and stretch, ensuring a snug fit during runs. This characteristic is essential for maintaining foot temperature and comfort over longer distances. On the other hand, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 also has a breathable design but emphasizes a heel overlay for added security. While both shoes prioritize breathability, the Brooks shoe’s engineered upper might provide a more accommodating fit for varied foot shapes.
Performance and Durability
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is ranked higher in sales at 1047, indicating its popularity among runners looking for a reliable performance shoe. Its newly designed outsole and midsole promote smooth transitions, making it ideal for those who run often. The Nike Women's Run Swift 3, with a sales rank of 1650, also aims to deliver performance but may not have the same level of refined technology as the Brooks shoe. For dedicated runners seeking performance and durability, the Brooks option may stand out as the stronger contender.
Target Audience
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is geared towards runners requiring enhanced support and comfort, especially those who may have specific foot needs, as it is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe. This certification, along with the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicates its suitability for a broader range of users, including those with foot conditions. In contrast, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 targets casual runners or those new to the sport who are looking for a stylish, comfortable option without the need for specialized support. The choice between these two shoes will depend heavily on the runner's individual needs and running style.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 and the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 ultimately comes down to your specific running needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced support, comfort, and durability for long-distance running, the Brooks shoe, priced at $98.95, may be worth the investment. However, if you're looking for a more affordable option for casual runs, the Nike shoe at $85.00 offers solid performance without breaking the bank. Each shoe has its strengths, and understanding your own running style will help you make the best choice.

