Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive vs Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive wins on sales rank and price, Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8 wins on weight and performance.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers better comfort and support for everyday runners, while the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 excels in speed and performance for competitive athletes.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
Price
Brooks is $98.95, Saucony is $130.66
Comfort
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning
Sales Rank
Brooks ranks 1,047, Saucony ranks 13,551
Why Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8 is better
Performance
Saucony is designed for race day speed
Weight
Saucony is lighter for faster runs
Technology
Saucony uses carbon plate for enhanced performance
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive | Saucony Women's Endorphin Pro 4 Sneaker, Mirage/Citron, 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | DNA Loft v3 | PWRRUN PB |
| Fit | Accommodating | Snug |
| Upper Material | Air Mesh | Synthetic |
| Target Use | Daily Training | Race Day |
| Certification | PDAC A5500 | None |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 and Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is priced at $98.95, making it about 24% cheaper than the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4, which retails at $130.66. This price difference may be a significant factor for budget-conscious runners. Both shoes serve distinct purposes, with the Adrenaline GTS 24 geared towards providing support and comfort for everyday runs, and the Endorphin Pro 4 designed for speed and performance during races.
Target Audience and Use Cases
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is ideal for runners seeking a supportive shoe for daily training, while the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 targets those looking for a lightweight sneaker that excels on race day. The Adrenaline GTS 24 is equipped with features that cater to runners who require extra support, as evidenced by its certification as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and the APMA Seal of Acceptance. In contrast, the Endorphin Pro 4 emphasizes speed, utilizing technologies like a carbon plate for enhanced race performance.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 shines with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which offers plush comfort that adapts to the unique stride of each runner. This makes it not just suitable for short runs but also for longer distances. Meanwhile, the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 focuses on a fast and light experience, providing snappy responsiveness rather than plush cushioning. This differentiation in comfort styles makes the Brooks ideal for casual runners, while the Saucony appeals to competitive athletes.
Weight and Performance
The Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 is designed with performance in mind, utilizing technologies like PWRRUN PB and SPEEDROLL to deliver a lightweight and speedy experience. This shoe is likely to appeal to those who prioritize speed over long-term comfort. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, while slightly heavier due to its supportive features, offers a different kind of performance that emphasizes stability and smooth transitions, making it better suited for regular training sessions.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is crucial for running shoes, and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features an engineered air mesh upper that provides excellent ventilation. This design ensures that runners remain comfortable during longer runs. The Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 also considers fit and comfort but focuses more on a snug, performance-oriented fit rather than a wide, accommodating structure. Therefore, runners who prioritize breathability may prefer the Brooks model, while those looking for a race-ready fit might lean towards the Saucony.
Aesthetics and Design
Aesthetic appeal can influence a runner's choice, and both shoes offer distinct looks. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes in a classic black colorway, making it versatile for everyday wear. Meanwhile, the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 is available in a more vibrant Mirage/Citron color, appealing to those who want their running shoes to stand out. The choice between these designs may come down to personal preference regarding color and style.
Sales Rank and Market Position
In terms of sales rank, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 holds a strong position at 1,047, indicating its popularity among consumers. The Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4, with a sales rank of 13,551, may not be as sought after, possibly due to its specialized nature aimed at competitive runners. This difference in sales rank reflects the broader appeal of the Brooks shoe for everyday runners compared to the more niche market of the Saucony model.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 and the Saucony Women’s Endorphin Pro 4 comes down to your specific running needs. If you prioritize comfort, support, and a budget-friendly price, the Brooks model is an excellent choice. However, if speed and performance are your primary concerns, and you're willing to invest in a higher-priced shoe, the Saucony may better serve you. Each shoe has its strengths, catering to different types of runners, so your personal running style and goals should guide your decision.

