Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive wins on support and comfort, Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 wins on durability and breathability.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers better support and a lower price, while the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 excels in plush cushioning and style.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
Price
Brooks is $21 cheaper than Saucony.
Support
Brooks features Guiderails Holistic Support System.
Sales Rank
Brooks has a significantly better sales rank.
Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better
Cushioning
Saucony uses premium PWRRUN+ foam for maximum comfort.
Versatility
Saucony is designed for both running and casual wear.
Style
Saucony offers a more vibrant color option.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive | Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Saucony |
| Model | Adrenaline GTS 24 | Triumph 22 |
| Cushion Type | DNA Loft v3 | PWRRUN+ |
| Upper Material | Air Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is a supportive running shoe priced at $98.95, making it about 17% cheaper than its competitor. This shoe is designed to provide comfort and support, featuring nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning that adapts to your stride. With a sales rank of 1047, it is well-regarded among runners seeking reliable footwear. The shoe is certified as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, ensuring it meets specific health standards, and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance, highlighting its comfort and support features.
Overview of the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22
The Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 is a premium sneaker priced at $119.95. It emphasizes plush cushioning and comfort, thanks to its PWRRUN+ foam construction. This shoe has a sales rank of 34383, indicating a different market presence compared to the Brooks model. It is tailored for neutral runners and boasts a breathable engineered mesh upper, ensuring comfort during extended wear. The Triumph 22 is designed for daily training and long distances, making it a versatile choice for various activities.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 offers dynamic cushioning that adapts to the user’s unique stride, providing a lightweight feel mile after mile. Its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 midsole foam ensures a plush experience for those looking to run long distances. On the other hand, the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 features premium PWRRUN+ foam, delivering maximum cushioning and superior shock absorption. While both shoes excel in comfort, the Triumph 22 is specifically designed for all-day wear, making it ideal for both running and casual use.
Support Features
Support is a standout feature of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24, equipped with the innovative Guiderails Holistic Support System. This technology aids in maintaining natural motion while preventing excess movement, making it particularly beneficial for runners who require additional stability. In contrast, the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 is a neutral running shoe, offering smooth transitions and a stable platform but lacking the targeted support system found in the Adrenaline GTS 24. For those needing extra support, the Brooks shoe would be the preferable option.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is crucial in running shoes, and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 features an engineered air mesh upper designed for optimal airflow and a comfortable fit. This aspect is essential for maintaining comfort during runs. Meanwhile, the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 also employs a breathable engineered mesh upper that adapts to the foot for a secure fit, reducing hot spots and irritation. Both shoes effectively prioritize breathability, but the fit may vary, with the Triumph 22 focusing more on a snug, adaptive feel.
Outsole and Durability
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is designed with a newly engineered outsole that promotes smooth transitions, enhancing the running experience. Its durability is complemented by the shoe's overall supportive structure. In contrast, the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 features a high-abrasion rubber outsole that provides long-lasting durability and reliable grip on various surfaces. While both shoes are built to last, the Triumph 22 focuses on traction for pavement and urban surfaces, making it suitable for a variety of running conditions.
Style and Aesthetic
In terms of style, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes in a sleek black color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a classic look. The shoe’s design is understated yet functional, fitting seamlessly into a runner's gear. Conversely, the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 is available in a more vibrant Vapor/Moon color combination, appealing to those who favor modern aesthetics and a bit of flair in their footwear. Both shoes cater to different style preferences, ensuring that runners can choose based on their personal tastes.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 and the Saucony Women’s Triumph 22 ultimately depends on your running needs and preferences. If you prioritize support and stability, particularly for long-distance running, the Brooks model is a strong contender, especially given its lower price of $98.95. However, if you seek plush cushioning and a shoe suitable for everyday wear, the Saucony Triumph 22, priced at $119.95, may be the better choice. Each shoe offers distinct advantages, making it important to align your pick with your specific running style and comfort requirements.

