Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive wins on price and support, Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, wins on flexibility.
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 excels in support and cushioning, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is a budget-friendly option with decent comfort.
Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better
Support
Brooks has advanced support technology.
Cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Durability
Brooks is designed for longevity with advanced materials.
Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, is better
Price
Under Armour is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Under Armour is lighter, appealing to speed-focused runners.
Flexibility
Under Armour is a neutral shoe, offering more flexibility.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive | Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Under Armour |
| Model | Adrenaline GTS 24 | Charged Assert 10 |
| Cushioning | DNA Loft v3 | Charged Cushioning |
| Support Type | Supportive | Neutral |
| Upper | Engineered Mesh | Breathable Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 and Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is a supportive running shoe priced at $98.95, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is more budget-friendly at $54.95, making it about 44% cheaper. Both shoes cater to different types of runners and feature distinct technologies, appealing to varying preferences in cushioning, support, and overall comfort.
Design and Aesthetics
When it comes to design, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 showcases a sleek silhouette with a black, ebony, and white color scheme that emphasizes its performance-oriented features. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 presents a more casual look, with a predominantly black appearance accented by white elements. The breathable mesh upper of the Assert 10 is designed for durability and support, but the engineered air mesh upper of the Adrenaline GTS 24 provides an enhanced fit and feel. Both shoes are visually appealing, yet they cater to different aesthetic preferences.
Cushioning and Comfort
Cushioning is a key feature where the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 excels, utilizing nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning for a plush, lightweight comfort that adapts to the wearer’s stride. This technology emphasizes a smooth transition while running, making it ideal for those seeking a cushioned experience. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 employs Charged Cushioning, which uses compression molded foam to provide responsiveness and durability. Although it offers decent comfort, it may not match the plushness of the Adrenaline GTS 24's advanced cushioning system.
Support and Stability
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is specifically engineered for support, featuring the Guiderails Holistic Support System that helps maintain the body's natural motion path while managing excess movement. This makes it particularly beneficial for runners who require stability during their runs. On the other hand, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is classified as a neutral shoe, focusing on flexibility and cushioning rather than providing structured support. Runners who need more stability may find the Adrenaline GTS 24 more suitable for their needs.
Weight and Performance
Weighing in at approximately 9.0 ounces, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is slightly lighter and may appeal to runners who prioritize speed and agility. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24’s performance is enhanced by its supportive features and cushioning, which could make it feel a bit heavier but offers a more comfortable experience over longer distances. The difference in weight may influence a runner's choice depending on their performance goals and personal preferences.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is a crucial factor in any running shoe, and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 incorporates a solid rubber outsole that covers high-impact zones, making it robust for everyday wear. However, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is designed with longevity in mind, utilizing advanced materials that not only provide support but also aim to withstand the test of time. The investment in the Adrenaline GTS 24 may result in a longer lifespan, especially for those who run regularly.
Price Point and Value
The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is priced at $98.95, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 costs $54.95, making the latter about 44% cheaper. This significant price difference may appeal to beginner runners or those looking for a more economical option without sacrificing basic performance features. However, the Adrenaline GTS 24's advanced technology and support may justify its higher price for serious runners or individuals with specific foot support needs.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 depends largely on your specific needs as a runner. If you're looking for superior support, advanced cushioning, and a shoe that caters to stability, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is a worthy investment. However, if you're on a budget and prioritize a lighter, more flexible shoe, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 would be a fitting choice. Ultimately, both shoes serve their purpose well, but the right choice hinges on your running style and preferences.