vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive vs Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium

Updated July 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive wins on support and cushioning, Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium wins on price.

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 offers superior support and a lower price, making it a better choice for those needing stability. The Hoka Women's Clifton 10 is ideal for those seeking a lightweight, plush feel.

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive is better

Price

Brooks is $12.01 cheaper than Hoka.

Support

Brooks features a GuideRails support system.

Health Certification

Brooks is certified as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe.

Why Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium is better

Weight

Hoka is known for its ultralight cushioning.

Fit

Hoka offers a more relaxed fit.

Style

Hoka has a minimalist aesthetic.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive
85
Hoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium
78

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 SupportiveHoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium
BrandBrooksHOKA
ModelAdrenaline GTS 25Clifton 10
CushioningDNA LOFT v3Ultralight
UpperEngineered MeshJacquard Knit
CertificationPDAC A5500None

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 SupportiveHoka Women's Clifton 10 White/White 7.5 Medium

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is priced at $132.99, making it about 17% cheaper than the Hoka Women's Clifton 10, which retails for $145.00. This price difference may appeal to those looking for a reliable running shoe without breaking the bank. While both shoes are designed for comfort during running and walking, the Brooks option offers a more budget-friendly choice, especially for regular users looking to invest in a quality pair of running shoes over time.

Features Overview

When it comes to features, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is equipped with a holistic GuideRails support system and premium nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning. This shoe is designed specifically for runners and walkers who require reliable support and a smooth ride. On the other hand, the Hoka Women's Clifton 10 highlights its jacquard knit upper and lightweight cushioning, aiming to provide comfort for daily maintenance miles. While both shoes focus on comfort, the Brooks model offers more advanced support features, which may be beneficial for those who need additional stability during their runs.

Comfort and Fit

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is built with a breathable engineered mesh upper that ensures a secure, comfortable fit alongside a flat-knit collar. This design helps accommodate natural movement during physical activity. Conversely, the Hoka Women's Clifton 10 features a breathable jacquard upper with a double-lace lock to prevent tongue migration. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model's focus on a snug fit and stability may suit runners who require additional support, whereas the Hoka model is geared towards those seeking a more relaxed fit.

Cushioning Technology

Cushioning is a critical factor in any running shoe, and both models offer unique technologies. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 features nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning that provides a lightweight, soft feel and dynamic energy return. In comparison, the Hoka Women's Clifton 10 also delivers ultralight cushioning but emphasizes a plush performance with an additional 3mm in heel-to-toe drop. Runners who prefer a softer landing with vibrant energy return may lean towards the Brooks, while those who enjoy a plush feel without sacrificing weight might favor the Hoka.

Performance for Different Activities

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is ideal for both running and walking, specifically designed for those seeking reliable support. This shoe is recognized as a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance, highlighting its suitability for various foot health needs. The Hoka Women's Clifton 10, known for its daily maintenance capabilities, provides a trusted option for regular runs. However, it lacks the specific health certifications that the Brooks shoe boasts, which could be an essential consideration for individuals with specific foot health requirements.

Style and Aesthetics

In terms of aesthetics, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 is available in a vibrant Spellbound/Blazing Bell/Pink color scheme, making it visually appealing for those who value style in their athletic gear. The Hoka Women's Clifton 10 opts for a cleaner look with its White/White finish, catering to a more minimalist taste. While both shoes are stylish in their own right, the choice may come down to personal preference for color and style, with the Brooks offering more bold options.

Durability and Build Quality

Both the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 and the Hoka Women's Clifton 10 are built with quality materials aimed at durability. The Brooks shoe's engineered mesh upper is designed to withstand regular use while maintaining breathability. Similarly, the Hoka model's jacquard knit upper is crafted for longevity and comfort. However, the Brooks shoe’s additional certifications suggest a focus on not just performance but also long-term wearability, which could be significant for users who put their shoes through rigorous daily use.

Which should you buy?

When deciding between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 and the Hoka Women's Clifton 10, it ultimately comes down to your specific needs as a runner or walker. If you prioritize support, certification for foot health, and a lower price point, the Brooks is an excellent choice. On the other hand, if you're looking for a lightweight, plush feel without the need for specialized support, the Hoka may be more suitable. Consider the features that matter most to you, as both shoes excel in different areas, catering to distinct preferences in the running community.