vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive vs Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,

Updated July 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive wins on price and support, Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, wins on weight.

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 offers superior support and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is a budget-friendly option with decent comfort.

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive is better

Support

Brooks features GuideRails for enhanced stability.

Cushioning

Brooks uses nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 for plush comfort.

Bestseller Rank

Brooks ranks 459, indicating higher popularity.

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, is better

Price

Under Armour is significantly cheaper at $51.95.

Weight

Under Armour is lighter at 10.05 oz.

Design

Under Armour offers a classic aesthetic.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 Supportive
85
Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,
70

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 SupportiveUnder Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,
BrandBrooksUnder Armour
Current Price$132.99$51.95
Cushion TypeDNA LOFT v3Charged Cushioning
Support SystemGuideRailsNone
Bestseller Rank4592697

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 SupportiveUnder Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is significantly cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25. Priced at $51.95, the Charged Surge 4 is about 61% less expensive than the Adrenaline GTS 25, which retails for $132.99. This notable price difference makes the Under Armour shoe an attractive option for budget-conscious shoppers. While the Brooks model might offer specialized features for serious runners, the Under Armour shoe provides solid performance at a much lower price point, making it accessible to a wider audience.

Comfort and Cushioning

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 excels in comfort and cushioning, featuring nitrogen-infused DNA LOFT v3 cushioning that provides a plush feel for runners and walkers. This model is designed to deliver distraction-free comfort, ideal for long distances. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 employs Charged Cushioning, which offers a balance of comfort and responsiveness. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model focuses on a more premium cushioning experience, making it a preferred choice for those seeking long-lasting support during extended activities.

Support Features

Support is a key differentiator between these two running shoes. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 incorporates an innovative GuideRails holistic support system that helps maintain natural motion while minimizing excess movement. This feature is especially beneficial for runners needing extra stability. Conversely, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 offers a breathable mesh upper and enhanced cushioning around the ankle collar for comfort but lacks the advanced support technology found in Brooks. Therefore, if support during runs is a priority, the Adrenaline GTS 25 is the superior choice.

Weight and Flexibility

In terms of weight, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is lighter, weighing 10.05 oz, compared to the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25, which does not specify its weight. This lighter construction can contribute to a more agile running experience, making the Charged Surge 4 a solid option for casual runners or those looking for a shoe that feels less cumbersome. The Brooks model, although potentially heavier, focuses more on support and stability, which may be preferable for serious runners or walkers who prioritize those features over weight.

Design and Aesthetics

Both shoes come in appealing designs, but they cater to different tastes. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 showcases a vibrant colorway of Spellbound/Blazing Bell/Pink, appealing to those who like a bold aesthetic in their running gear. The Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is offered in a more subdued White/Distant Gray/Metallic Silver palette, which might attract users who prefer a classic look. While subjective, aesthetics can often influence purchasing decisions, and these distinct styles cater to varied preferences among potential buyers.

Bestselling Status

The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 holds a bestseller rank of 459, indicating a strong market presence and popularity among running enthusiasts. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 ranks 2697 in sales. This difference in bestseller rank suggests that the Brooks shoe may have a more established reputation, particularly among serious runners seeking reliable performance. While both shoes have their merits, the higher rank of the Adrenaline GTS 25 could sway consumers looking for tried-and-true options.

Durability and Traction

Both running shoes are designed with durability in mind, but they feature different approaches. The Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 includes a rubber outsole designed for smooth transitions and lasting performance, making it suitable for various terrains. The Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 also features a durable rubber outsole; however, its emphasis is on providing flexibility and traction during toe-off, catering to runners who value agility. Depending on the running environment, either shoe could meet durability needs, but the Brooks model offers a more robust design for diverse conditions.

Which should you buy?

In summary, choosing between the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 25 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 hinges on your specific needs. If you prioritize advanced support, comfort, and a well-established reputation, the Brooks shoe is the better option despite its higher price. However, if you're looking for a budget-friendly alternative that still offers comfort and a lightweight design, the Under Armour shoe is an excellent choice. Ultimately, your decision should reflect your personal running style and budget constraints.