Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & wins on support and fit, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe wins on breathability.
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 offers superior support and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & is better
Support
Brooks offers maximum support with GuideRails technology.
Cushioning
Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Popularity
Brooks has a higher sales rank at 3,616.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper at $72.24.
Breathability
New Balance has a breathable engineered mesh upper.
Lightweight
New Balance is designed for a lightweight ride.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Ariel GTS 24 | Fresh Foam 680 v9 |
| Cushioning | DNA Loft v3 | Fresh Foam |
| Stability | GuideRails | None |
| Upper | Engineered | Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is significantly cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24, priced at $72.24 compared to $119.95. This means that the New Balance shoe is about 40% less expensive than its competitor. Although pricing often reflects the features and technology offered, budget-conscious consumers may find the New Balance option appealing without sacrificing too much in performance.
Comfort and Cushioning
In terms of comfort and cushioning, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 excels with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, designed to adapt to individual strides while providing durable comfort. This feature is particularly beneficial for those requiring maximum support during runs or walks. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 also offers comfort through its Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, but it is primarily designed for a lightweight ride rather than maximum support. For individuals with specific support needs, the Brooks shoe's advanced cushioning technology may be the better choice.
Stability Features
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is equipped with GuideRails technology, which helps maintain natural motion and limits excess joint movement, making it particularly suitable for those seeking stability in their footwear. The linear last construction further enhances support and stability. In contrast, the New Balance shoe focuses more on underfoot comfort with an integrated rubber outsole but does not emphasize stability features to the same extent. Therefore, runners or walkers who require enhanced stability may prefer the Brooks model.
Breathability
Breathability is another area of difference between these two shoes. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper that allows for adequate airflow, keeping feet cooler during longer runs. While the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 does not specifically mention breathability in its features, its engineered upper is designed for a secure fit, which may not prioritize ventilation to the same extent as the New Balance. For those running in warmer climates or for extended periods, the New Balance may be the more comfortable option.
Target User
The target user for the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 includes runners and walkers who require maximum support and comfort, which is emphasized by its certification as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and the APMA Seal of Acceptance. This makes it an excellent choice for individuals with specific foot conditions or those who prioritize comfort and support in their athletic footwear. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is geared more towards casual runners looking for a lightweight and comfortable shoe without the specialized features of the Brooks model.
Sales Rank and Popularity
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 has a sales rank of 3,616, indicating a solid level of popularity, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 has a sales rank of 13,435. This suggests that the Brooks shoe is more favored among consumers, possibly due to its advanced support features. However, the New Balance option still enjoys a respectable rank, indicating that it appeals to a different segment of the market that values affordability and lightweight design.
Aesthetic Appeal
Aesthetically, both shoes offer appealing designs, but they cater to different tastes. The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 comes in a stylish Coconut/Chateau/Portabella colorway that may attract those looking for a trendy yet functional shoe. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 boasts a more straightforward design that emphasizes practicality and comfort. Ultimately, the choice between aesthetics will depend on personal preference and the type of running or walking experience one is seeking.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 comes down to individual needs and budget. If maximum support, stability, and advanced cushioning are your priorities, the Brooks model is the superior option, albeit at a higher price of $119.95. However, if you are looking for a more budget-friendly shoe that provides comfort and breathability for casual running at $72.24, the New Balance is an excellent choice. Each shoe has its strengths, so consider what features matter most to you before making your final decision.

