Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & wins on support and fit, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX wins on style and breathability.
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 offers superior support and cushioning for serious runners, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX is a budget-friendly option for casual wear.
Why Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & is better
Support
Brooks provides advanced stability features.
Cushioning
Brooks has nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.
Fit
Brooks offers a generous and roomy fit.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper.
Weight
New Balance is designed for a lightweight feel.
Style
New Balance has a vibrant color scheme.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | New Balance |
| Model | Ariel GTS 24 | Fresh Foam Arishi v4 |
| Sales Rank | 3616 | 32236 |
| Cushion Type | DNA Loft v3 | Fresh Foam |
| Upper Material | Engineered | Mesh |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is priced at $119.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX is significantly cheaper at $68.00. This makes the New Balance shoe about 43% less expensive than the Brooks model. Considering the substantial price difference, budget-conscious buyers may find the New Balance option more appealing for casual use or light running. However, the Brooks shoe's higher price may reflect its advanced support features and targeted design for serious runners and walkers.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 features a sophisticated colorway of Coconut, Chateau, and Portabella, designed to appeal to those who prioritize style alongside performance. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX comes in a vibrant Pink Salt/Rosewood combination, catering to those who enjoy a more modern and energetic look. Both shoes exhibit thoughtful design, but the Brooks model's elegant palette may attract runners seeking a classic aesthetic, while the New Balance shoe's bright colors may resonate with younger, trendier consumers.
Support and Stability
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is engineered for maximum support and comfort with features such as nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning and GuideRails technology, which helps maintain a natural motion path. This shoe is especially beneficial for individuals requiring extra stability during their runs or walks. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX, on the other hand, offers a lightweight ride with Fresh Foam midsole cushioning but does not boast the same level of support technology. Therefore, for those focused on stability, the Brooks shoe is likely the better choice.
Cushioning and Comfort
Comfort is a key differentiator between these two models. The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 provides resilient cushioning that adapts to the wearer's unique stride, making it a favorite among serious runners and walkers. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX also offers comfortable cushioning with its Fresh Foam midsole but is designed more for a lightweight feel rather than maximum support. If you prioritize soft, adaptive cushioning for extended runs, the Brooks shoe is likely to provide a more satisfying experience.
Fit and Sizing
The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is noted for its engineered upper that provides a generous and roomy fit, enhancing overall comfort during activity. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX features a sleek fit due to its no-sew overlays, which may cater better to those who prefer a more snug feel. Users with wider feet may find the Brooks model more accommodating, while those looking for a closer fit may favor the New Balance option.
Durability and Outsole
When it comes to durability, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 utilizes a linear last construction for stability and longevity, making it suitable for various terrains. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX is equipped with a durable rubber outsole, which also contributes to its longevity but may not provide the same level of support for heavy use. Runners expecting to log significant miles may prefer the Brooks shoe for its built-in stability and durability features.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Brooks and New Balance are both respected brands in the athletic footwear industry, but they target slightly different audiences. The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 holds a sales rank of 3,616, indicating a strong market presence among serious runners seeking support and comfort. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX has a sales rank of 32,236, which may suggest it appeals more to casual wearers. Brand loyalty and reputation may influence purchasing decisions, with Brooks being a go-to for performance-oriented athletes.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 TIRALUX hinges on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for maximum support, stability, and a shoe that can handle serious running or walking, the Brooks model is worth the investment at $119.95. However, if you're more of a casual runner or need a budget-friendly option for everyday activities, the New Balance shoe at $68.00 provides excellent value without sacrificing comfort. Consider what features matter most to you, and choose accordingly.

