Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral wins on weatherproof and comfort, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe wins on breathability.
The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized offers superior features for diverse conditions, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is a budget-friendly option focused on comfort.
Why Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral is better
Price
Brooks offers advanced features for a higher price.
Traction
Brooks has all-weather traction for better grip.
Support
Brooks provides neutral support for various activities.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better
Price
New Balance is significantly cheaper.
Cushioning
New Balance emphasizes ultra-cushioned comfort.
Weight
New Balance is likely lighter due to its design.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized Neutral | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | DNA Loft v3 | Fresh Foam |
| Upper | DWR mesh | Engineered mesh |
| Sales Rank | 5547 | 13435 |
| Weatherproof | Yes | No |
| Use Case | Versatile | Casual |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized is priced at $103.23, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is significantly cheaper at $72.24, making it about 30% less expensive. This price difference of approximately $31 highlights a substantial cost advantage for the New Balance option, which may appeal to budget-conscious runners. If you're looking for a solid running shoe without breaking the bank, the New Balance model might be the better choice.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, both models excel, but they approach it differently. The Brooks Women's Ghost 16 Weatherized features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, providing a soft and lightweight feel that's ideal for road running and cross training. Its design focuses on neutral support, making it a great option for various activities. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 utilizes precision-engineered Fresh Foam midsole cushioning, offering an ultra-cushioned ride that emphasizes comfort and ease. While both shoes provide excellent cushioning, the Brooks model is specifically designed for a more diverse range of activities, while the New Balance focuses purely on comfort.
Traction and Weather Resistance
The Brooks Women's Ghost 16 Weatherized stands out with its all-weather traction, featuring a specially designed outsole that enhances grip on both wet and dry surfaces. This makes it a suitable choice for those who run in varying weather conditions. Moreover, its DWR mesh upper not only protects against the elements but also regulates temperature effectively. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 does not emphasize weather resistance but maintains comfort with its integrated rubber outsole. If you often run in unpredictable weather, the Brooks model may offer the extra security you need.
Upper Construction
In terms of upper construction, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized boasts a knit DWR mesh upper that provides superior weather protection while ensuring breathability. This feature enhances the shoe's ability to keep your feet dry and comfortable in diverse conditions. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper. While both shoes prioritize breathability, the Brooks model's weatherproof characteristics give it an edge for runners who may face rain or moisture during their runs.
Weight and Build
The weight and build of running shoes can significantly affect performance. While specific weights are not provided, the Brooks Women's Ghost 16 Weatherized is designed to deliver lightweight comfort through its nitrogen-infused cushioning. This aspect allows for easier movement during runs. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9, focusing on an ultra-cushioned ride, is likely to be heavier given the emphasis on comfort. Runners looking for a lighter shoe that maintains support might lean toward the Brooks option, while those preferring a plush feel may find the New Balance suitable.
Popularity and Sales Rank
In terms of popularity, the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized has a sales rank of 5,547, indicating a solid presence in the market. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9, on the other hand, has a higher sales rank of 13,435. This suggests that the Brooks model is more favored among consumers, which could be attributed to its specialized features catering to neutral support and weather conditions. If you value a product that has been well-received by fellow runners, the Brooks model may hold an advantage.
Target Audience
The target audience for these two shoes varies based on their features. The Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized is designed for runners needing neutral support with versatility across different terrains and weather conditions. Its advanced features cater to those who prioritize performance and stability. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 appeals to individuals seeking a comfortable, everyday running shoe primarily focused on cushioning. This model is perfect for those who enjoy casual runs or walks where comfort takes precedence over specialized performance features.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Ghost 16 Weatherized and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 ultimately depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you're looking for a versatile shoe that offers excellent traction, weather resistance, and advanced cushioning for various activities, the Brooks model is worth the investment despite its higher price of $103.23. However, if budget is a primary concern and comfort is your top priority for casual runs, the New Balance model at $72.24 presents a fantastic value. Both shoes excel in their own right, so consider what features matter most to you as a runner.

