Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Price Comparison

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is about 37% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe. Priced at $72.24, the New Balance model offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the Brooks, which retails for $114.95. This significant price difference may influence buyers looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. While both shoes have unique features catering to different preferences, the cost is a crucial factor for many consumers.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort and cushioning, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 excels with its super-soft nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning. This advanced technology is designed to provide an extremely plush, responsive ride, making it ideal for runners seeking maximum comfort during their runs. The Glycerin 21 is recognized for its supreme softness, which has earned the APMA Seal of Acceptance. On the other hand, the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 also focuses on comfort with its precision-engineered Fresh Foam midsole, delivering an ultra-cushioned, lightweight ride. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks offers a more specialized cushioning system aimed at serious runners.

Fit and Design

The fit and design of the Brooks Glycerin 21 is enhanced by its plush internal stretch bootie that adapts to the foot's movements. This shoe features a newly engineered warp knit upper that is breathable and flexible, promoting a soft and accommodating fit. In contrast, the New Balance 680 v9 boasts a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper, which provides a comfortable fit but lacks the adaptive features seen in the Brooks. For runners who value a customizable fit that moves with them, the Brooks may be the superior choice, while the New Balance offers a more straightforward design.

Support and Stability

When it comes to support and stability, the Brooks Glycerin 21 is designed for neutral support, making it suitable for various types of runners. Its broad platform promotes smooth heel-to-toe transitions, enhancing stability throughout the running experience. The New Balance 680 v9, while also supportive, focuses more on underfoot comfort through its integrated rubber outsole. Although both shoes provide adequate support, the Brooks Glycerin 21 offers a more specialized experience for those who prioritize stability during their runs.

Performance in Different Conditions

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 is particularly suited for road running and cross-training, making it a versatile choice for various athletic activities. Its design aims to provide a super-soft experience on different running terrains. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9, while also effective for running, primarily emphasizes comfort and ease, which may make it less ideal for more rigorous training sessions. Runners looking for a shoe that performs well in diverse conditions may find the Brooks more appealing for its adaptability.

Breathability

Both shoes are designed with breathability in mind, but they utilize different methods to achieve this. The Brooks Glycerin 21 features a warp knit upper that is not only breathable but also soft against the foot, promoting airflow while maintaining comfort. The New Balance 680 v9 incorporates a premium molded engineered mesh upper, ensuring breathability but with a more traditional approach. While both shoes offer good ventilation, the Brooks’ innovative design might provide a slight edge for runners who sweat heavily.

Style and Aesthetics

In terms of style, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 comes in a sleek black/grey/white color scheme that appeals to many runners looking for a classic and versatile look. The New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 also features a modern design, but its aesthetic may attract those who prefer a more casual appearance. Ultimately, style preference is subjective, and both shoes offer visually appealing options for runners who care about aesthetics as much as performance.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 and the New Balance Women’s Fresh Foam 680 v9 depends on your specific needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, stability, and a custom fit, the Brooks Glycerin 21 is likely the better choice despite its higher price tag of $114.95. However, if you are looking for a more affordable option that still provides comfort and decent performance, the New Balance 680 v9, priced at $72.24, offers excellent value. Ultimately, both shoes cater to different types of runners, making your choice a matter of personal preference and budget.