Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on comfort and fit, Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, wins on weight and breathability.
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 offers superior comfort and performance, making it the better choice for serious runners, while the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Comfort
Glycerin 23 features advanced zonal DNA tuned cushioning.
Durability
Glycerin 23 is built for high-mileage use.
Fit
Glycerin 23 has a plush engineered upper for better fit.
Why Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, is better
Price
Revolution 8 is significantly cheaper.
Weight
Revolution 8 is lighter and more suitable for casual runs.
Breathability
Revolution 8 has a breathable mesh upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - | Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | Zonal DNA Tuned | Foam Midsole |
| Upper Material | Triple Jacquard Knit | Mesh |
| Sales Rank | 4982 | 1608 |
| Best Use | Neutral Running | Casual Running |
| Color Options | Multiple | Limited |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and Nike Women's Revolution 8
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is priced at $159.99, while the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is significantly cheaper at $60.00, making it about 62% less expensive. Both shoes cater to different types of runners, with the Glycerin 23 designed for neutral runners seeking premium comfort and the Revolution 8 targeting casual runners looking for affordable performance. With a bestseller rank of 4982 for the Glycerin 23 and 1608 for the Revolution 8, the Nike model appears to be more popular among consumers.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 excels with its zonal DNA tuned cushioning, which offers a plush feel and better responsiveness thanks to an upgraded nitrogen-infused midsole. This shoe is tailored for long runs and daily training, providing a luxurious ride that supports high mileage. In contrast, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 features a foam midsole designed for comfort-focused rocker geometry, delivering decent cushioning but not quite at the same level as the Glycerin 23. For runners prioritizing comfort over cost, the Brooks option may be the better choice.
Breathability and Fit
The fit and breathability of a running shoe are crucial for performance. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 has a newly enhanced triple jacquard warp-knit upper that offers a plush and breathable fit, reducing pressure points during long wear. On the other hand, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 utilizes a mesh upper that is more breathable than its predecessor, the Revolution 7. While both shoes provide adequate breathability, the engineered upper of the Glycerin 23 offers a more secure and comfortable fit, making it potentially better for extended running sessions.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 showcases a modern design with its White/Phantom/Cyber Pink colorway, appealing to those who appreciate a stylish look in their running gear. The Nike Women's Revolution 8 comes in a Black/White-Iron Grey combination, providing a classic yet versatile design. While both shoes are visually appealing, the choice may ultimately come down to personal preference in color and style, with the Glycerin 23 arguably offering a more contemporary aesthetic.
Performance for Different Running Needs
If you’re a runner focused on performance, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is tailored for neutral runners and designed for long-distance comfort and smooth transitions. Its wide platform and sculpted midsole promote balanced movement and efficiency in every stride. Conversely, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is more suited for casual running or those new to the sport, providing adequate support without the advanced features found in the Glycerin 23. For serious runners, the Brooks might be the preferable option, while beginners may find the Nike suitable for their needs.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is a key factor when investing in running shoes. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is built with high-mileage comfort in mind, suggesting it can handle extensive use without quickly wearing down. The Nike Women's Revolution 8, while functional, may not match the durability of the Glycerin due to its focus on affordability and basic features. If long-term use is a priority, the Brooks model is likely to provide better value over time despite its higher initial cost.
Price Comparison and Value
With a price tag of $159.99, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is significantly more expensive than the Nike Women's Revolution 8 at $60.00. This price difference of about $99.99 reflects the advanced features and enhanced performance capabilities of the Glycerin 23. While the Revolution 8 offers a budget-friendly option, it may not deliver the same level of performance or comfort. For those on a tight budget, the Nike could be appealing, but for serious runners willing to invest in their footwear, the Glycerin 23 offers greater value for the price.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and the Nike Women's Revolution 8 ultimately depends on your running needs and budget. The Glycerin 23 is the superior choice for neutral runners seeking premium comfort, advanced cushioning, and durability, justifying its higher price point. However, if you're looking for a basic, affordable running shoe for casual use, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is a solid option at about 62% less. Consider your running habits and budget to make the best decision for your footwear needs.

