Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes,
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on comfort and cushioning, Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, wins on style.
The Brooks Glycerin 23 offers superior comfort and cushioning, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Nike Run Swift 3 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks features advanced nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED cushioning.
Fit
Brooks has an engineered upper for a distraction-free fit.
Stability
Brooks promotes smooth transitions with its wide platform.
Why Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, is better
Price
Nike is significantly cheaper at $85.
Sales Rank
Nike has a better sales rank of 1650.
Weight
Nike is lighter, making it easier for casual runs.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - | Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Brooks | Nike |
| Current Price | $159.99 | $85.00 |
| Cushion Type | DNA TUNED | Foam |
| Upper Material | Warp-knit | Flywire |
| Weight | Heavy | Light |
Dimension comparison
Overview
When it comes to running shoes, the choice between Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe and Nike Women's Run Swift 3 Road Running Shoes boils down to comfort and price. The Brooks shoe is priced at $159.99, making it a premium option, while the Nike shoe comes in at a budget-friendly $85.00, about 47% cheaper. Understanding the key differences in features and performance will help you decide which shoe suits your needs best.
Comfort and Cushioning
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is designed for neutral runners seeking maximum comfort. It features upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED cushioning, providing 2mm more cushioning in the forefoot for softer landings. This shoe delivers a plush ride ideal for long runs or daily training. In contrast, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 offers foam cushioning that delivers a soft underfoot feel, but it may not match the plush sensation provided by the Brooks model. While both shoes aim to provide comfort, the Glycerin 23 stands out with its premium cushioning technology.
Fit and Support
In terms of fit, the Brooks shoe features a newly enhanced triple jacquard warp-knit upper that conforms to the foot while reducing pressure points during extended wear. This engineered upper ensures a distraction-free fit, crucial for long-distance runs. On the other hand, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 utilizes Flywire cables to secure the foot and provide additional support when the laces are tightened. While both shoes offer supportive designs, the Brooks Glycerin 23's engineered upper may provide a more plush and comfortable fit for longer durations.
Stability and Performance
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 promotes smooth and stable transitions with its wide platform and strategic midsole sculpting. This design encourages balanced movement and seamless heel-to-toe transitions during runs. The Nike Women's Run Swift 3, while stable due to its heel overlay, does not highlight specific features aimed at improving transition efficiency. This makes the Glycerin 23 a better choice for runners focused on performance over longer distances, where stability is crucial.
Versatility for Different Running Conditions
The Brooks shoe is built for high-mileage comfort and versatility, making it suitable for easy jogs, long runs, and recovery days. With its 8mm offset and premium midsole package, it adapts well to various running conditions. Conversely, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 is tailored for road running but does not emphasize the same level of versatility. While both shoes are designed for running, the Brooks Glycerin 23 offers broader functionality for different training scenarios.
Aesthetic Appeal
Both shoes come in distinctive colorways, appealing to different tastes. The Brooks Glycerin 23 features a striking White/Phantom/Cyber Pink combination, while the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 showcases a White/Black-Pearl Pink-Peony palette. Aesthetic choice ultimately comes down to personal preference, but both options present stylish designs suitable for both running and casual wear.
Price and Value
Price is a significant differentiator between these two models. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is priced at $159.99, which may be justified by its advanced features and comfort. In contrast, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 is available for a more affordable $85.00, making it a practical choice for budget-conscious shoppers. The price difference of about $74 can be substantial, especially for those who may not require the high-end features of the Brooks model.
Bestseller Rank and Popularity
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 holds a sales rank of 4982, while the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 is notably higher on the list with a rank of 1650. This suggests that the Nike model has a greater market presence and may appeal to a broader audience. However, the Brooks shoe's specialized features may cater to a more niche market focused on comfort and performance.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 ultimately depends on your individual running needs and budget. If you prioritize advanced cushioning, comfort, and stability for long-distance runs, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is worth the investment at $159.99. However, if you're looking for a budget-friendly option that still offers decent support for everyday runs, the Nike Women's Run Swift 3 at $85.00 is a solid choice. Consider your running habits and preferences to make the best decision for your footwear needs.

