vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - vs Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on performance and comfort, Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, wins on weight and price.

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 excels in comfort and performance, making it ideal for serious runners, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Comfort

Glycerin 23 offers superior cushioning.

Performance

Designed for serious runners.

Durability

Built for high mileage.

Why Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, is better

Price

Charged Assert 10 is significantly cheaper.

Weight

Lighter at 8.9 oz.

Versatility

Suitable for casual use.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
85
Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
65

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,
BrandBrooksUnder Armour
Current Price$159.99$54.95
CushioningDNA TUNEDCharged Cushioning
Offset8mm10mm
WeightNot specified8.9 oz

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10,

Price Comparison

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is priced at $159.99, while the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is significantly cheaper at $54.95, making it about 65% less expensive. This stark price difference can be a crucial factor for budget-conscious consumers. The Glycerin 23, known for its premium features aimed at serious runners, commands a higher price due to its advanced technology and materials. In contrast, the Charged Assert 10 offers a more budget-friendly option, appealing to casual runners or those just starting out.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 excels with its upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole that provides plush cushioning. This shoe is designed for neutral runners seeking smooth performance over long distances. The Glycerin 23 includes 2mm more cushioning in the forefoot compared to its predecessor, enhancing the overall comfort experience. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 features Charged Cushioning® that uses compression molded foam for responsiveness, but it does not match the plush feel of the Glycerin. Thus, for runners prioritizing comfort on long runs, the Glycerin 23 is the superior choice.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, both shoes present eye-catching styles, but they cater to different preferences. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 showcases a modern aesthetic with its white, phantom, and cyber pink color scheme, making it visually appealing for those who enjoy vibrant footwear. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, on the other hand, offers a sleek black design that is both versatile and understated. While the Glycerin 23 aims to stand out, the Charged Assert 10 provides a classic look suitable for various occasions beyond running.

Breathability and Fit

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 features a newly enhanced triple jacquard warp-knit upper, which allows for a breathable and foot-conforming fit. This design reduces hot spots and pressure points, making it ideal for extended wear during long runs. In contrast, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 utilizes a lightweight, breathable mesh upper with synthetic overlays for added support. While both shoes are breathable, the Glycerin 23's upper is noted for its plush comfort and secure fit, which may appeal to runners looking for a more custom-like feel.

Durability and Construction

Durability is a key attribute for any running shoe, and both options have their strengths. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is built for high mileage and features a wide platform that promotes balanced movement, which can contribute to its longevity. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10, with its solid rubber outsole covering high-impact zones, also emphasizes durability but weighs less at 8.9 oz. While both shoes are designed to withstand regular use, the Glycerin 23's construction may better support runners who prioritize long-term durability over lighter weight.

Performance on the Track

Performance-wise, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is designed specifically for neutral runners looking for premium comfort and smooth transitions. Its 8mm offset supports a natural stride, making it suitable for long runs and daily training. The Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is also for neutral runners, offering flexibility and cushioning but is more tailored for casual use and shorter distances. For serious athletes or those training for marathons, the Glycerin 23 likely provides superior performance benefits, while the Charged Assert 10 is better suited for recreational runners.

Target Audience

The target audiences for these shoes differ significantly. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is aimed at serious runners and athletes who seek high-performance features and are willing to invest in their footwear. Its bestseller rank of 4982 reflects its popularity among dedicated runners. Conversely, the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 is designed for casual runners or those new to the sport, seeking a reliable yet affordable option for everyday wear. Its lower price point and versatile design make it appealing to a broader audience.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Assert 10 ultimately comes down to your running habits and budget. If you are a serious runner looking for advanced comfort and performance technology, the Glycerin 23 is worth the investment at $159.99. However, if you are a beginner or casual runner seeking a budget-friendly option that still offers decent comfort and support, the Charged Assert 10 at $54.95 is an excellent choice. Each shoe has its unique strengths, making the best option highly dependent on individual needs and preferences.