vsversusfinder

Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on responsiveness and comfort, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe wins on breathability and popularity.

The Brooks Women’s Revel 7 offers a more responsive ride, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 focuses on ultra-cushioning and comfort. Choose based on your preference for responsiveness or cushioning.

Why Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Responsiveness

Brooks offers enhanced energy return.

Comfort Technology

Brooks features adaptable DNA midsole.

Sales Rank

Brooks has a solid customer base despite lower sales rank.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better

Price

New Balance is $2.71 cheaper.

Breathability

New Balance emphasizes a breathable upper.

Popularity

New Balance has a higher sales rank.

Overall score

Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
85
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
80

Specifications

SpecBrooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe -New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
CushioningDNA midsoleFresh Foam
Upper MaterialKnitEngineered mesh
WeightLightweightUltra-cushioned
FitMedium widthLace closure
Sales Rank1977713435

Dimension comparison

Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe -New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe

Overview

In this comparison, we will explore two popular running shoes: the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 Neutral Running Shoe and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe. Both shoes are designed for comfort and performance, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences for runners. The Brooks shoe is priced at $74.95, while the New Balance alternative comes in at $72.24, making it about 2% cheaper than its competitor.

Comfort and Cushioning

Comfort is a key factor for runners, and both shoes excel in this area. The Brooks Women’s Revel 7 features an adaptable DNA midsole cushioning technology that adjusts to your stride, weight, and speed, providing excellent impact protection. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 utilizes a precision-engineered Fresh Foam midsole, which offers an ultra-cushioned and lightweight ride. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Brooks model's unique DNA technology may appeal to those looking for a more personalized fit and cushioning experience.

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 boasts a sleek and sporty look with its updated knit upper that combines style, structure, and breathability. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a premium molded engineered mesh upper that is both breathable and supportive. The visual appeal of each shoe may vary depending on personal taste, but both brands have focused on creating aesthetically pleasing options that will look great during workouts or casual outings.

Fit and Sizing

The fit of a running shoe is crucial for performance and comfort, and both shoes cater to women’s sizing. The Brooks Women’s Revel 7 is available in a medium width, ensuring a snug fit for most runners. Similarly, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a lace closure system that allows for an adjustable fit. While fit can be subjective, both options are designed to accommodate various foot shapes and preferences, making them suitable for a wide range of runners.

Breathability

Breathability plays a significant role in ensuring comfort during runs, especially on warmer days. The Brooks Women’s Revel 7 incorporates a versatile upper that balances stability with breathability, making it a great choice for extended wear. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 focuses on a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper that enhances airflow. While both shoes prioritize ventilation, the New Balance shoe's specific emphasis on a breathable upper may provide a slight edge for those who sweat more during runs.

Performance and Responsiveness

Performance is where these shoes start to differentiate themselves. The Brooks Women’s Revel 7 is designed to provide a responsive feel, thanks to its construction that enhances energy return throughout activities. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners looking for a more dynamic running experience. In comparison, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 emphasizes comfort over response with its ultra-cushioned ride. Runners seeking a more energetic feel might prefer the Brooks model, while those who prioritize comfort may lean towards New Balance.

Price Comparison

The price of the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 is set at $74.95, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is available for $72.24. This makes the New Balance shoe about $2.71 cheaper, or roughly 4% less than the Brooks option. When considering budget constraints, the slight difference in price could make the New Balance shoe more appealing for those looking to save a little money without sacrificing quality.

Sales and Popularity

In terms of popularity, the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 holds a sales rank of 19,777, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 ranks slightly higher at 13,435. This indicates that the New Balance shoe may be favored more by consumers, potentially due to its price point or specific features attracting a broader audience. However, both models have their own loyal customer bases, reflecting the strength of each brand in the running community.

Which should you buy?

Both the Brooks Women’s Revel 7 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 offer excellent features for runners, but they cater to different preferences. The Brooks model is ideal for those seeking a responsive, cushioned experience with a sleek design, while the New Balance shoe is better suited for runners looking for a lightweight, ultra-cushioned ride at a slightly lower price. Ultimately, the choice will depend on individual priorities, be it comfort, responsiveness, design, or budget.