Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - vs New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price and comfort, New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running wins on versatility and responsiveness.
The Brooks Women’s Trace 4 offers superior comfort and value, while the New Balance FuelCell Rebel V5 provides a more responsive feel for varied activities.
Why Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Price
Brooks is $53.20 cheaper than New Balance.
Cushioning
Brooks features DNA LOFT v2 for maximum comfort.
Durability
Brooks has a RoadTack rubber outsole designed for longevity.
Why New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running is better
Responsiveness
New Balance uses FuelCell foam for a propulsive feel.
Versatility
New Balance is suitable for various activities beyond running.
Lightweight
New Balance has a lighter design with FantomFit upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe - | New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | DNA LOFT v2 | FuelCell foam |
| Upper Material | Breathable mesh | Streamlined mesh |
| Outsole | RoadTack rubber | Longitudinal pods |
| Fit | Secure fit | Ultra-light support |
| Style | White/Oyster/Rose | Linen/Grey Matter/White |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to the Running Shoes
In the realm of women's running shoes, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 Neutral Running Shoe and the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 Running Shoe present two distinct options catering to different preferences. Priced at $91.75, the Brooks shoe is about 37% cheaper than the New Balance model, which retails for $144.95. This price difference sets the stage for a comparison that will highlight their unique features and performance capabilities.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 stands out with its DNA LOFT v2 soft cushioning, designed to provide an adaptable ride that reacts to individual strides. This shoe aims for maximum comfort mile after mile, making it an excellent choice for long-distance running. In contrast, the New Balance FuelCell Rebel V5 utilizes FuelCell foam, which gives a propulsive feel that helps drive the runner forward. While both shoes emphasize comfort, the Brooks shoe offers a softer, more cushioned experience, whereas the New Balance leans towards a responsive feel for varied running styles.
Design and Aesthetics
The Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is visually appealing with its White/Oyster/Rose color scheme, which is both stylish and functional thanks to its breathable mesh upper. This feature helps keep runners dry and comfortable during their workouts. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's FuelCell Rebel V5 in Linen/Grey Matter/White also offers a sleek design with a streamlined mesh upper, adding a race-inspired aesthetic. While both shoes are designed to look good, the choice comes down to personal preference regarding color and style.
Performance on Different Terrains
In terms of performance, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 excels on road surfaces, thanks to its RoadTack rubber outsole designed for durability and rebound. This shoe is tailored for smooth transitions, making it ideal for longer runs. Conversely, the New Balance FuelCell Rebel V5 features longitudinal outsole pods that provide versatile traction, suitable for both road and light trail running. The Brooks shoe, with its segmented crash pad and sculpted grooves, may appeal more to those focused on road running, while the New Balance model caters to runners looking for versatility in their footwear.
Fit and Support
Fit and support are critical in running shoes, and both models offer unique benefits. The Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is designed with a secure fit through its breathable upper, which also allows for excellent airflow. This shoe aims to create a comfortable fit that adapts to the foot. In contrast, the New Balance FuelCell Rebel V5 features a FantomFit upper that provides ultra-light bonded support. This construction ensures a snug fit that is less bulky, catering to runners who prefer a lighter shoe. The choice here hinges on whether you value a more cushioned fit or a lighter, more supportive structure.
Versatility for Different Activities
The Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is primarily designed for running, emphasizing comfort and smooth transitions for long distances. However, its durability also makes it suitable for casual wear. The New Balance FuelCell Rebel V5, with its responsive cushioning and lightweight design, is more versatile, accommodating various activities from training to casual outings. This flexibility allows it to adapt to a wide range of running styles, appealing to athletes who engage in different types of workouts.
Price and Value
At $91.75, the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 is a compelling option for budget-conscious runners, providing significant savings compared to the New Balance model, which is priced at $144.95. This represents about a 37% difference in price, making the Brooks shoe an attractive value proposition for those who prioritize comfort without breaking the bank. While the New Balance FuelCell Rebel V5 offers advanced technology and performance features, the price difference raises questions about whether the additional investment is justified for casual runners.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Brooks Women’s Trace 4 and the New Balance Women’s FuelCell Rebel V5 ultimately depends on your specific running needs and budget. The Brooks shoe shines with its exceptional comfort, soft cushioning, and significantly lower price point, making it an ideal choice for long-distance runners seeking value. On the other hand, the New Balance shoe offers a more responsive feel and versatility for various activities, which could justify its higher price for dedicated athletes. In summary, if you prefer a comfortable, budget-friendly shoe for road running, the Brooks would be your best bet. However, if you're looking for a propulsive, multi-purpose trainer and are willing to invest more, the New Balance might be worth considering.

