New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe vs Saucony Women's Cohesion 15 Running Shoe, Black/Meadow, 9
Updated August 2026 — New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe wins on price and cushioning, Saucony Women's Cohesion 15 Running Shoe, Black/Meadow, 9 wins on eco-friendliness.
The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 offers superior cushioning and popularity, while the Saucony Women's Cohesion 15 is more affordable and eco-friendly.
Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better
Cushioning
Fresh Foam provides ultra-cushioned ride
Popularity
Higher sales rank indicates strong user preference
Comfort
Engineered for plush comfort during runs
Why Saucony Women's Cohesion 15 Running Shoe, Black/Meadow, 9 is better
Price
Saucony is approximately 30% cheaper
Eco-Friendliness
Vegan and uses recycled materials
Weight
Lighter and breathable mesh upper
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe | Saucony Women's Cohesion 15 Running Shoe, Black/Meadow, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | New Balance | Saucony |
| Model | Fresh Foam 680 v9 | Cohesion 15 |
| Cushioning Type | Fresh Foam | VERSARUN |
| Upper Material | Engineered Mesh | Breathable Mesh |
| Sales Rank | 13435 | 17375 |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 15 Running Shoe is the more economical option, priced at $50.54, compared to the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe, which retails for $72.24. This makes the Saucony shoe approximately 30% cheaper than its competitor. For those looking to save while still enjoying quality running shoes, the Saucony option presents a compelling choice without sacrificing essential features.
Comfort Features
Both running shoes prioritize comfort, but they do so through different technologies. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a Fresh Foam midsole that is engineered for an ultra-cushioned and lightweight ride, making it ideal for runners who seek a plush feeling during their runs. On the other hand, the Saucony Cohesion 15 incorporates VERSARUN cushioning, which absorbs impact and reduces pressure, providing a comfortable stride. While both models aim to enhance comfort, the specific technologies used cater to different preferences, with New Balance leaning towards plushness and Saucony focusing on impact absorption.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 15 Running Shoe is available in a striking Black/Meadow color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a bolder look. Conversely, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 has a more classic appeal with its textile upper and breathable engineered mesh. While personal style is subjective, the choice between these two may come down to whether a runner prefers a more vibrant design or a traditional aesthetic.
Performance and Durability
When it comes to performance, the New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 ranks higher with a sales rank of 13,435, indicating its popularity among runners. Its integrated rubber outsole supports underfoot comfort, which can enhance performance during longer runs. The Saucony Cohesion 15, with a sales rank of 17,375, also uses a rubber outsole designed for durability and a smooth feel over long distances. Although both shoes perform well, the New Balance may have a slight edge in overall popularity and perceived performance among users.
Breathability
Breathability is a key factor for runners, and both shoes exhibit good features in this area. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 is designed with a breathable premium molded engineered mesh upper, allowing for adequate airflow to keep feet cool during runs. Meanwhile, the Saucony Cohesion 15 features a light and breathable mesh upper, ensuring a fresh and cool experience. Both models successfully address the need for breathability, making them suitable for various weather conditions, though the choice may ultimately depend on personal comfort preferences.
Eco-Friendliness
For environmentally conscious consumers, the Saucony Women's Cohesion 15 stands out as a more eco-friendly choice. This model is vegan and incorporates recycled upper materials, appealing to those who prioritize sustainability in their footwear. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 does not highlight any specific sustainable practices, which may influence buyers who are looking to minimize their environmental footprint.
Brand Reputation
Both New Balance and Saucony are reputable brands within the running community, known for their commitment to producing quality footwear. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9, with its higher sales rank, suggests a strong following and trust among users. However, Saucony also has a dedicated customer base that appreciates the Cohesion line for its reliability and performance. Ultimately, brand loyalty may play a role in the decision-making process, depending on past experiences and personal connections to either brand.
Which should you buy?
In deciding between the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe and the Saucony Women's Cohesion 15 Running Shoe, your choice will depend on budget, comfort preferences, and environmental considerations. The Saucony model is about 30% cheaper and offers eco-friendly features, making it a great option for budget-conscious, environmentally aware buyers. Conversely, if you prioritize plush cushioning and a more classic aesthetic, the New Balance may be worth the higher price. Ultimately, both shoes provide solid performance, but your personal needs will determine the best fit for your running routine.

