vsversusfinder

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe vs Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, White/Mist, 8.5

Updated August 2026 — New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe wins on weight and design, Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, White/Mist, 8.5 wins on price and cushioning.

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 offers a budget-friendly option with lightweight comfort, while the Saucony Women's Guide 18 excels in cushioning and support for serious runners.

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is better

Price

New Balance is $27.71 cheaper.

Weight

New Balance is designed to be lighter.

Design

New Balance has a more traditional look.

Why Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, White/Mist, 8.5 is better

Cushioning

Saucony features advanced PWRRUN cushioning.

Support

Saucony provides better stability for overpronators.

Durability

Saucony has a more durable outsole for varied surfaces.

Overall score

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe
75
Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, White/Mist, 8.5
85

Specifications

SpecNew Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running ShoeSaucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, White/Mist, 8.5
BrandNew BalanceSaucony
ModelFresh Foam 680 v9Guide 18
CushioningFresh FoamPWRRUN
UpperTextileMesh
OutsoleRubberRubber

Dimension comparison

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running ShoeSaucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, White/Mist, 8.5

Price Comparison

The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe is priced at $72.24, making it about 17% cheaper than the Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker, which retails for $99.95. This price difference can be significant for budget-conscious shoppers looking for reliable running shoes. The Fresh Foam 680 v9 offers a more economical option while still delivering quality features aimed at enhancing comfort during runs. Meanwhile, the Guide 18, despite its higher price, positions itself as a premium choice, highlighting its advanced cushioning and stability features.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort, both shoes provide excellent cushioning, but they achieve this through different technologies. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a Fresh Foam midsole that is precision-engineered for a lightweight and cushioned ride. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Guide 18 incorporates PWRRUN cushioning, designed to offer long-lasting softness and energy return. This means that while the Fresh Foam might feel lighter, the PWRRUN is focused on providing a plush, responsive running experience, catering to those who prioritize comfort over weight.

Fit and Support

When it comes to fit and support, the Saucony Women's Guide 18 excels with its adaptive fit system that keeps the foot snug and well-supported. This is particularly beneficial for runners who experience mild overpronation, as the Guide 18 includes a TPU guidance frame that enhances stability. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 features a lace closure and a breathable engineered mesh upper, which, while offering good ventilation, may not provide the same level of support for those needing extra stability during their runs.

Design and Aesthetics

The aesthetic appeal of running shoes can influence purchasing decisions, and both models present distinct styles. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 showcases a more traditional running shoe design with a focus on functionality. Its textile upper and integrated rubber outsole provide a streamlined look. Conversely, the Saucony Women's Guide 18 stands out with its modern and sleek design, featuring a breathable mesh upper and a colorway that combines white and mist. This may attract those who value style as much as performance in their footwear.

Durability and Traction

Durability is a key factor in the longevity of running shoes, and both options have robust outsoles designed for various surfaces. The New Balance Fresh Foam 680 v9 includes an integrated rubber outsole that supports underfoot comfort, promising a decent lifespan. Meanwhile, the Saucony Guide 18 features a durable rubber outsole designed for excellent traction across multiple surfaces, including roads and tracks. This focus on traction could be particularly advantageous for runners who frequently train in varied environments, ensuring they maintain their grip regardless of conditions.

Weight

Weight is an essential consideration for runners, especially those who prioritize speed. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is designed to be lightweight, contributing to its comfortable ride. While specific weight measurements are not provided, its design suggests it aims to be on the lighter side of running shoes. The Saucony Women's Guide 18, while also lightweight, is designed to offer maximum cushioning, which can sometimes add a bit of weight. Runners seeking agility might prefer the New Balance option, while those who value cushioning may lean towards Saucony.

Performance on the Run

Performance during runs can vary based on shoe technology and design. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 is engineered for an ultra-cushioned experience, making it suitable for casual runners looking for comfort. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Guide 18 is crafted for runners who appreciate a balance of comfort and support, thanks to its PWRRUN technology and stability features. The Guide 18's focus on support may benefit those who run longer distances or require extra reinforcement, making it a more performance-oriented choice.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam 680 v9 Running Shoe and the Saucony Women's Guide 18 Sneaker ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you are looking for a budget-friendly option that prioritizes lightweight comfort, the Fresh Foam 680 v9 at $72.24 is a compelling choice. However, if you are willing to invest more for superior cushioning and stability, the Saucony Guide 18 at $99.95 may be worth the splurge. Both shoes cater to different types of runners, so consider your running style and requirements when making your decision.