adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash vs ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, leads on cushioning and comfort.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers superior performance features and cushioning, making it the better choice for serious runners, while the adidas model is more budget-friendly.
Why adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash is better
Price
adidas is more affordable at $50.70
Comfort
Cloudfoam cushioning provides all-day comfort
Fit
Regular fit appeals to various foot shapes
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better
Performance
Rearfoot GEL technology enhances impact absorption
Breathability
Jacquard mesh upper improves airflow
Sales Rank
ASICS has a stronger sales rank of 1,155
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas Women's Response Pace Running, Dash | ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning Type | Cloudfoam | Rearfoot GEL |
| Upper Material | Textile | Jacquard mesh |
| Sockliner | Ortholite | Ortholite |
| Outsole | Standard | Synthetic rubber |
| Weight | Light | Moderate |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the adidas Women's Response Pace Running
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running shoes are priced at $50.70, making them an attractive option for budget-conscious runners. They feature Cloudfoam cushioning, which enhances comfort and support throughout the day. This model has a sales rank of 9,394, indicating a moderate level of popularity among consumers. With a regular fit and a textile upper, these shoes combine functionality with a stylish aesthetic.
The product description emphasizes the shoe's focus on comfort, thanks to the Ortholite sockliner that adds an extra layer of cushioning. This feature is particularly beneficial for those who spend long hours on their feet. Overall, the adidas Women's Response Pace Running shoes are designed for casual runners looking for reliable footwear without breaking the bank.
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes come with a higher price tag of $64.95, making them about 28% more expensive than the adidas model. However, they boast advanced features such as Rearfoot GEL technology, which enhances impact absorption and provides a softer feel upon footstrike. This model has a strong sales rank of 1,155, showcasing its popularity among runners.
The shoe features a jacquard mesh upper that improves airflow and a synthetic rubber outsole engineered for stability. The Ortholite sockliner also makes an appearance, ensuring excellent step-in comfort. Overall, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is aimed at those who prioritize performance and comfort in their running shoes.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, both the adidas Women's Response Pace Running and ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offer exceptional cushioning, but they do so differently. The adidas model utilizes Cloudfoam technology, designed for all-day comfort and support. This feature is great for casual runners or those who spend long periods on their feet.
In contrast, the ASICS shoe incorporates Rearfoot GEL technology, which is specifically engineered to improve impact absorption. This technology allows for a gentler footstrike, making it ideal for more serious runners who might be concerned about joint impact during their workouts. Both shoes feature an Ortholite sockliner, but the ASICS model’s advanced cushioning may provide an edge for those seeking maximum comfort during intense runs.
Fit and Design
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running shoes are designed with a regular fit, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 has a jacquard mesh upper that enhances airflow. The regular fit of the adidas model may appeal to those who prefer a looser feel, making it suitable for various foot shapes.
On the other hand, the ASICS model not only focuses on breathability but also incorporates synthetic stitching on the overlays to improve support. This can be particularly beneficial for runners who require additional stability during their runs. The aesthetic appeal of both shoes is strong, but the choice in fit and design may ultimately depend on individual preferences and needs.
Performance Features
Both shoes come equipped with features that enhance performance, but their approaches differ. The adidas Women's Response Pace Running shoes emphasize comfort with their Cloudfoam cushioning and Ortholite sockliner. These features are aimed at providing a plush experience for everyday wear and light runs.
In comparison, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 focuses on performance with its Rearfoot GEL technology and flex grooves in the outsole that enhance flexibility. These features are tailored for runners who seek to improve their performance and require shoes that can adapt to various terrains. Thus, while the adidas model may be great for casual use, the ASICS shoe is better suited for those who push their limits.
Breathability and Durability
Breathability is an important factor for any running shoe, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 takes the lead with its jacquard mesh upper that promotes airflow. This feature helps in keeping the feet cool and comfortable during long runs, which is a significant advantage for serious athletes.
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running shoes, while also breathable due to their textile upper, may not offer the same level of ventilation as the ASICS model. In terms of durability, both shoes are designed to withstand regular use, but the synthetic stitching on the ASICS may provide extra support and longevity, making it a more durable option for avid runners.
Price Comparison
The adidas Women's Response Pace Running shoes are priced at $50.70, making them a budget-friendly choice. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is priced at $64.95, which is about 28% more expensive. While the higher price of the ASICS model reflects its advanced features, the adidas shoes offer a solid option for those looking for comfort without the higher investment.
This price difference could be a deciding factor for many consumers. If budget is a primary concern, the adidas model stands out as the more economical choice, while the ASICS may justify its price with enhanced performance features and technology.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the adidas Women's Response Pace Running and the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a comfortable, budget-friendly option for casual runs, the adidas model is a strong contender. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning and performance features for more serious running, the ASICS shoe may be worth the investment despite its higher price.
Both shoes have their merits, but understanding your running style and requirements will help you make the best choice. Consider factors such as budget, comfort, and performance features to determine which shoe aligns with your running goals.

