Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 vs ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 wins on durability, ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark wins on price and cushioning.
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is a more budget-friendly option, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers advanced cushioning and stability.
Why Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is 17% cheaper
Durability
Leather upper is more robust
Classic Design
Timeless aesthetic appeals to many
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better
Cushioning
FF BLAST PLUS offers superior comfort
Performance
FLUIDRIDE outsole enhances stability
Popularity
Higher bestseller rank indicates preference
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, White/Black/Grey, 8.5 | ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | ASICS |
| Model | Run 70s 2.0 | Gel-Excite 11 |
| Upper Material | Leather/Textile | Engineered Mesh |
| Cushioning Tech | Cloudfoam | FF BLAST PLUS |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is priced at $54.86, making it about 17% cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, which are priced at $74.95. This significant price difference may appeal to budget-conscious consumers looking for reliable running shoes without breaking the bank. While both shoes offer unique features and benefits, if cost is a primary factor in your decision-making, the Adidas option stands out as the more economical choice.
Design and Style
In terms of design, the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a classic aesthetic with a durable leather and textile upper in a White/Black/Grey color scheme. The lace-up closure allows for a custom fit, giving it a timeless look that blends well with various outfits. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 boasts a vibrant Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow color palette, appealing to those who prefer a more dynamic and sporty appearance. The engineered mesh upper of the ASICS shoe offers breathability, which is essential for runners. Both shoes have stylish elements, but your preference may hinge on whether you favor classic simplicity or bold vibrancy.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a critical aspect of any running shoe, and both models excel in this category but utilize different technologies. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 employs Cloudfoam cushioning to provide lightweight step-in comfort and superior cushioning. This feature is particularly beneficial for users who prioritize comfort during long runs or extended wear. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 incorporates FF BLAST PLUS and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, offering a cloud-like feel and responsive ride. With its approximately 65% softer PureGEL technology, the ASICS shoe is designed for underfoot comfort. Depending on your preference for cushioning style, either shoe can cater to comfort needs effectively.
Performance and Stability
When it comes to performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 has a slight edge due to its advanced technologies aimed at enhancing stability and smoothness during strides. The FLUIDRIDE outsole contributes to a more fluid running experience, while the engineered mesh upper reduces the need for additional overlays, allowing for greater flexibility. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0, while delivering a lightweight feel, may not provide the same level of stability as the ASICS model. If your running style requires superior performance features, you might find the ASICS shoe more suitable.
Durability
Both running shoes are built with durability in mind, but they employ different materials that contribute to their longevity. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 features a leather and textile upper, which is known for its robustness and ability to withstand daily wear and tear. This makes it a solid choice for runners looking for a long-lasting option. In comparison, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 utilizes a lightweight engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability but may not be as durable as leather. If durability is a primary consideration for your running shoes, the Adidas model may offer a slight advantage.
Fit and Sizing
Fit is crucial when selecting running shoes, and both models have specific recommendations. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 is noted to run big, with advice to buy half a size smaller for a better fit. This information is essential for consumers to consider to avoid sizing issues. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 has not specified any particular fit concerns. However, it features a wider fit option, accommodating runners who might need extra room. If finding the perfect fit is a priority, you may want to try both options in-store to ensure optimal comfort.
Brand Reputation and Popularity
Both Adidas and ASICS are reputable brands in the running shoe market, each with a loyal following. The Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 holds a bestseller rank of 2634, indicating solid sales performance among consumers. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 has a slightly better bestseller rank of 2352, suggesting it may be a more popular choice among buyers. Brand loyalty can influence purchasing decisions, and both brands have established themselves as leaders in producing quality running shoes.
Which should you buy?
When choosing between the Adidas Women's Run 70s 2.0 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11, your decision should consider price, design, comfort, performance, durability, fit, and brand reputation. The Adidas model is about 17% cheaper, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious consumers. However, if advanced cushioning and stability are your top priorities, the ASICS shoe may be worth the extra investment. Ultimately, the best choice will depend on your personal preferences and running needs.

