Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on breathability and comfort.
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is a budget-friendly option for casual runners, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 offers advanced cushioning for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $49.99.
Weight
Adidas is lighter at 257g.
Versatility
Adidas is suitable for casual wear and light jogging.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks features advanced DNA Tuned cushioning.
Support
Brooks provides better support for serious runners.
Durability
Brooks is engineered for longevity and performance.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Run Falcon 5 | Glycerin 22 |
| Midsole | Cloudfoam | DNA Tuned |
| Upper | Mesh | Double Knit |
| Sales Rank | 6652 | 844 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is priced at $49.99, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 costs significantly more at $114.95, making the Adidas model about 57% cheaper. Both shoes are designed for runners, but they cater to different preferences and budgets. The Adidas shoe is a lightweight option aimed at casual use, while the Brooks shoe focuses on advanced cushioning technology for serious runners.
Design and Aesthetics
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 features a classic black and white color scheme that is versatile for various outfits, making it suitable for both athletic and casual wear. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 showcases a more vibrant color palette of white, limpet shell, and amparo blue, appealing to those who prefer a more dynamic look. The design of the Glycerin 22 is also engineered for a breathable fit with a double jacquard knit upper, enhancing both style and functionality, while the Falcon 5 opts for a simpler, airy mesh upper.
Comfort and Fit
When it comes to comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 excels with its DNA Tuned cushioning technology, designed for soft landings and energetic toe-offs. This shoe is tailored for runners who prioritize maximum cushioning and smooth transitions. Meanwhile, the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 features a Cloudfoam midsole, providing a snug fit and cushioned comfort, though it may not offer the same level of support as the Glycerin 22. The Falcon 5 is designed for a secure fit with adjustable laces, making it comfortable for casual wearers or light runners.
Performance and Technology
In terms of performance, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 stands out with advanced cushioning technology that integrates dual-size cells for optimal support and energy return. Its broad platform stabilizes the foot for smooth transitions, making it ideal for running on various terrains. On the other hand, the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is lightweight and versatile, suitable for everyday tasks and moderate running, but it lacks the specialized performance features found in the Glycerin 22. This differentiation makes the Glycerin 22 a better choice for dedicated runners.
Durability and Wear
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is built with a durable Adiwear outsole, designed to handle everyday wear and tear, making it a practical choice for students or casual runners. The lightweight nature of the shoe weighs in at 257 grams for a size 5.5, contributing to its overall wearability for extended periods. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22, while heavier, is engineered for longevity and performance, featuring high-quality materials that ensure it withstands rigorous use. The Glycerin 22’s certification as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe also indicates a focus on health and safety, appealing to a broader range of users.
Price Comparison
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is priced at $49.99, making it a budget-friendly option compared to the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22, which is listed at $114.95. This price difference of approximately $65 gives the Adidas shoe a significant advantage for casual users or those new to running. The Glycerin 22's premium pricing reflects its advanced technology and specialized features, making it a worthy investment for serious runners who require superior cushioning and support.
Target Audience
The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is ideal for casual runners, students, or individuals looking for a versatile shoe that can transition from campus life to light jogging. Its lightweight design and affordable price point make it accessible to a broader audience. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 is tailored for dedicated runners who prioritize performance and comfort in their footwear. With its advanced cushioning technology and support features, it appeals to those seeking a high-quality running experience.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the decision between the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 comes down to your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a cost-effective, versatile shoe for casual wear and light running, the Adidas Falcon 5 is an excellent choice at $49.99. However, if you are a serious runner seeking maximum cushioning, support, and advanced technology, the Brooks Glycerin 22, despite its higher price of $114.95, may be worth the investment. Consider your running habits and preferences to make the best choice for your lifestyle.

