Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on price and performance.
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 offers superior comfort and performance for serious runners, while the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is a budget-friendly option for casual use.
Why Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $49.99.
Weight
Adidas is lighter at 257g.
Versatility
Adidas is more versatile for casual activities.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks has advanced nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED cushioning.
Fit
Brooks offers a plush, engineered upper for better fit.
Durability
Brooks is designed for high-mileage comfort and longevity.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, Black/White/Black, 8 | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Run Falcon 5 | Glycerin 23 |
| Price | $49.99 | $159.99 |
| Weight | 257g | unknown |
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | DNA TUNED |
| Fit Type | Snug | Plush |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 is significantly more budget-friendly than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23. The Run Falcon 5 is priced at $49.99, making it about 69% cheaper than the Glycerin 23, which retails for $159.99. This substantial price difference could be a deciding factor for those looking for solid running shoes without breaking the bank. While the Glycerin 23 offers a premium experience, the affordability of the Run Falcon 5 makes it an attractive option for casual runners or students.
Comfort and Cushioning
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 excels in providing premium comfort with its advanced cushioning technology. It features upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole, which offers 2mm more cushioning in the forefoot, ensuring softer landings and responsive toe-offs. In contrast, the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 utilizes a Cloudfoam midsole for cushioned comfort, making it a great choice for shorter runs or casual wear. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Glycerin 23 is designed for serious runners seeking enhanced cushioning during long runs or daily training.
Fit and Support
In terms of fit and support, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 stands out with its plush, engineered upper that conforms to the foot while reducing hot spots and pressure. This shoe is designed for neutral runners, providing a distraction-free fit that enhances the running experience. The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 also offers a snug fit through adjustable laces, but its focus is more on versatility for various casual activities rather than specialized running performance. For those prioritizing a tailored fit for running, the Glycerin 23 is the superior option.
Performance during Runs
When considering performance, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is engineered for smooth transitions and stable movement, making it ideal for longer distances. Its wide platform and strategic midsole sculpting promote harmonious movement from heel to toe, which is crucial for serious runners. The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, on the other hand, is lightweight and versatile, suitable for casual use and shorter runs but lacks the specialized design for high-performance running seen in the Glycerin 23. Therefore, if performance on longer runs is a priority, the Glycerin 23 is the better choice.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of design, personal preference plays a significant role. The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 comes in a classic Black/White/Black color scheme that appeals to those looking for a timeless athletic look. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23, however, features a more vibrant White/Phantom/Cyber Pink design, appealing to those who prefer a pop of color in their running gear. Both shoes deliver a modern aesthetic that aligns with current trends, but the choice will largely depend on individual style preferences.
Durability and Longevity
Durability is a critical consideration for any running shoe purchase. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is built to handle high-mileage comfort, designed for daily versatility and long-term use. Its advanced materials are intended to withstand rigorous training, making it a worthwhile investment for dedicated runners. The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 features a durable Adiwear outsole, excellent for everyday wear and casual activities, though it may not offer the same level of longevity under heavy running conditions as the Glycerin 23. For those focused on endurance and long-term performance, the Glycerin 23 is superior.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Brand reputation can influence purchasing decisions, and in this context, both brands hold strong standings in the running shoe market. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 has a sales rank of 4982, indicating its popularity among consumers. The Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5, with a sales rank of 6652, is also well-received, particularly among casual users. While both brands are respected, Brooks is often recognized for its commitment to serious running gear, making the Glycerin 23 a preferable choice for those prioritizing performance.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Adidas Women's Run Falcon 5 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 hinges on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for a cost-effective, versatile shoe for casual wear or light running, the Run Falcon 5 at $49.99 is a fantastic option. However, if you are a serious runner seeking premium comfort, stability, and long-lasting performance, the Brooks Glycerin 23, priced at $159.99, offers a superior experience. Your decision should reflect your running habits and priorities, whether they lean towards casual use or dedicated training.

