vsversusfinder

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on comfort and support.

The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a budget-friendly option for casual wear, while the Brooks Women's Glycerin 22 excels in performance and comfort.

Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better

Price

Adidas is $65.95 cheaper.

Weight

Adidas is lighter for casual use.

Design

Adidas has a minimalist look.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Comfort

Brooks features advanced cushioning technology.

Support

Brooks offers a flexible and accommodating fit.

Performance

Brooks is designed for serious running.

Overall score

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5
65
Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
85

Specifications

SpecAdidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
BrandadidasBrooks
ModelX_PLR PathGlycerin 22
CushioningCloudfoamDNA Tuned
UpperMeshDouble Jacquard
UseCasualPerformance

Dimension comparison

Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women's Glycerin 22, with a price difference of $65.95. The Adidas model retails at $49.00, while the Brooks model is priced at $114.95. This makes the Adidas shoe about 57% cheaper than its competitor. For budget-conscious buyers, this price discrepancy could be a deciding factor, especially if they are looking for a casual running shoe rather than a performance-focused model.

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, both shoes offer distinct visual appeal. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a sleek black and white color scheme, catering to those who prefer a minimalist look. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women's Glycerin 22 boasts a more vibrant combination of white, limpet shell, and amparo blue, appealing to those who enjoy a pop of color in their footwear. The choice between these two styles ultimately comes down to personal preference, but the Brooks shoe may stand out more in a crowd due to its brighter hues.

Comfort and Cushioning

The Brooks Women's Glycerin 22 excels in comfort and cushioning technology, utilizing DNA Tuned midsole technology for luxurious cushioning and smooth transitions. This model focuses on providing a plush feel, making it suitable for extended wear in various activities, from road running to gym sessions. In contrast, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a Cloudfoam midsole that offers decent cushioning and comfort for everyday use. While both shoes are designed for comfort, those prioritizing advanced cushioning technology may prefer the Brooks option.

Fit and Support

In terms of fit, the Brooks Women's Glycerin 22 is engineered with a double jacquard knit upper that ensures a flexible and accommodating fit. This is particularly beneficial for individuals with wider feet or those who require extra room. On the other hand, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path has a textile and synthetic mesh upper that provides breathability but may not offer the same level of adaptability as the Brooks shoe. Therefore, if fit and support are paramount, the Brooks option has a clear advantage.

Performance and Versatility

The Brooks Women's Glycerin 22 is designed for high-performance activities, providing neutral support and maximum cushioning. It is ideal for serious runners or those engaged in cross-training, while the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is more of a lifestyle sneaker suitable for casual wear and light running. The Brooks shoe's versatility makes it a better choice for varied workout environments, whereas the Adidas model is best suited for day-to-day activities rather than rigorous exercise.

Breathability

Both models incorporate materials that promote breathability, but they achieve this in different ways. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path uses a mesh upper that allows for airflow, making it suitable for warm weather. Conversely, the Brooks Women's Glycerin 22 features a breathable upper that not only enhances ventilation but also adds to the shoe's overall comfort. For those who prioritize breathability during physical activities, both options perform well, but the Brooks shoe's design might provide a slight edge due to its advanced engineering.

Weight

Weight can significantly impact a runner's performance, and here, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path likely has the advantage as a lightweight option intended for everyday wear. While specific weights aren’t provided for either shoe, the lightweight design of the Adidas model is a key selling point, making it more appealing for casual use and shorter runs. The Brooks Women's Glycerin 22, designed for performance, may weigh more due to its added cushioning and support features, which could be a consideration for those seeking a less bulky shoe.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the Brooks Women's Glycerin 22 ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for an affordable and stylish sneaker for everyday wear, the Adidas option at $49.00 is an excellent choice. However, if you're seeking advanced cushioning, support, and performance for serious running or cross-training, the Brooks model, priced at $114.95, may justify the higher cost. Consider your priorities—be it price, comfort, or performance—to make the best choice for your footwear needs.