Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 wins on style, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on fit and comfort.
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a budget-friendly option for casual wear, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 excels in performance and comfort for serious runners.
Why Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $49.00.
Style
Adidas offers a sleek, modern design.
Lightweight
Adidas is designed for casual, everyday use.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Comfort
Brooks features advanced cushioning for long runs.
Durability
Brooks is built for high-mileage training.
Performance
Brooks offers smooth transitions and stability.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Women's X_PLR Path, Black/White/Black, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | X_PLR Path | Glycerin 23 |
| Sales Rank | 2513 | 4982 |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Warp-knit |
| Midsole | Cloudfoam | DNA TUNED |
| Outsole | Rubber | Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is a lightweight sneaker designed for everyday wear, priced at $49.00. With a sales rank of 2,513, it has gained popularity among casual users seeking comfort and style. This shoe features a mesh upper and Cloudfoam midsole, providing breathability and cushioned support for daily activities. The low-profile rubber outsole contributes to its sleek design while ensuring good grip.
Overview of the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is a premium running shoe priced at $159.99. This model ranks 4,982 in sales, reflecting its appeal to neutral runners looking for comfort and performance during long runs. It boasts advanced features like zonal DNA tuned cushioning and a plush engineered upper, making it ideal for daily training and recovery days. The shoe is also certified for diabetic use and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance.
Price Comparison
When it comes to pricing, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path is significantly more budget-friendly at $49.00, making it about 69% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23, which retails for $159.99. This considerable price difference may influence buyers who are looking for economical options for casual wear rather than specialized running shoes. If you're on a budget, the Adidas model offers a compelling choice without sacrificing style and comfort.
Target Audience
The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path caters primarily to casual users looking for lightweight sneakers suitable for everyday wear. Its design focuses on providing comfort for light activities rather than performance metrics. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is engineered for neutral runners who require a high level of cushioning and support during extended runs. This shoe targets serious athletes and those engaged in regular training, making it less suitable for casual wear.
Comfort and Cushioning
Comfort is a key differentiator between these two models. The Adidas Women's X_PLR Path features a Cloudfoam midsole that offers decent cushioning for everyday use. However, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 takes comfort to another level with its upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA tuned cushioning, which provides a more responsive and plush experience during runs. While the Adidas model is comfortable for short walks, the Brooks is specifically designed for high-mileage use, making it ideal for long distances.
Design and Aesthetics
In terms of aesthetics, the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path presents a sleek, modern look with a black, white, and black color scheme. Its mesh upper not only enhances breathability but also contributes to its stylish appeal. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 features a white, phantom, and cyber pink design, aimed at those who prefer a vibrant and sporty appearance. Both shoes have unique visual elements, but the choice ultimately depends on personal style preferences.
Performance and Functionality
The performance capabilities of the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 are tailored for athletes. It offers smooth and stable transitions, making it suitable for various running conditions. The shoe's wider platform enhances stability, allowing for seamless heel-to-toe movement. Conversely, while the Adidas Women’s X_PLR Path is adequate for casual activities, it lacks the advanced performance features found in the Brooks model, making it less effective for serious runners.
Durability and Longevity
Regarding durability, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is built to withstand high-mileage training, thanks to its robust construction and premium materials. This model is designed for longevity and can handle the wear and tear that comes with regular running. The Adidas Women’s X_PLR Path, while durable for casual use, may not hold up as well under the demands of frequent running or intense workouts, making it a less viable option for serious athletes.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Women's X_PLR Path and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 ultimately depends on your needs and budget. If you're looking for an affordable, stylish sneaker for everyday wear, the Adidas model at $49.00 is a solid choice. However, if you require a high-performance running shoe with advanced cushioning and stability features, the Brooks Glycerin 23, despite its higher price of $159.99, offers a superior experience for serious runners. Assess your priorities—whether it's casual use or serious training—to make the best choice.

