adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, vs ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
Updated August 2026 — adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, wins on price, ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark wins on performance and breathability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers superior performance and advanced technology, while the adidas Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 excels in comfort and affordability.
Why adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, is better
Price
Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is $57.00, more affordable than Gel-Excite 11.
Comfort
Cloudfoam's memory sockliner provides excellent step-in comfort.
Sustainability
Cloudfoam is made with at least 50% recycled content.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better
Performance
Gel-Excite 11 features advanced FF BLAST PLUS cushioning.
Sales Rank
Gel-Excite 11 has a higher sales rank of 2352.
Breathability
Engineered mesh upper in Gel-Excite 11 enhances airflow.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes, | ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark |
|---|---|---|
| Cushioning | Cloudfoam | FF BLAST PLUS |
| Upper Material | Textile | Engineered Mesh |
| Weight | Lightweight | Lightweight |
| Sales Rank | 8845 | 2352 |
| Recycled Content | 50% | 0% |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes are designed for comfort and style, priced at $57.00. These shoes feature a lightweight design and a women's-specific fit, making them an appealing choice for casual runners or those seeking comfortable everyday footwear. With a sales rank of 8845, they are positioned as a popular option, especially for those who prioritize comfort in their running shoes.
The Cloudfoam Pure 2.0's upper is made from a soft textile that offers stretch and comfort. Additionally, the Cloudfoam memory sockliner molds to the foot, enhancing step-in comfort. This shoe also incorporates at least 50% recycled content, reflecting adidas' commitment to sustainability. Overall, this shoe balances performance with eco-consciousness, appealing to environmentally aware consumers.
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes are priced at $74.95, offering a blend of advanced technology and comfort. With a sales rank of 2352, they stand out as a strong contender in the running shoe category. These shoes are designed to provide a responsive ride with superior cushioning features, making them suitable for both casual runs and more intense workouts.
The Gel-Excite 11 employs FF BLAST PLUS cushioning for a lightweight feel, while the PureGEL technology offers a softer experience compared to standard options. The engineered mesh upper enhances breathability, making these shoes suitable for warmer weather or longer runs. With these innovations, the Gel-Excite 11 positions itself as a high-performance choice for serious runners.
Comfort and Fit Comparison
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 focuses heavily on comfort, featuring a memory sockliner that adapts to the foot for a personalized fit. This is particularly beneficial for users who desire a snug yet forgiving shoe. The lightweight design and stretchy textile upper contribute to a comfortable experience, ensuring that wearers can enjoy extended periods of use without discomfort.
On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 prioritizes responsive cushioning with its FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technologies. This shoe is designed to provide a comfortable underfoot experience while maintaining a level of responsiveness that serious runners appreciate. The engineered mesh upper also allows for breathability, which can make a significant difference during longer runs. In terms of comfort, both shoes excel, but they cater to slightly different preferences: the Cloudfoam emphasizes a plush feel, while the Gel-Excite 11 offers more responsiveness.
Performance and Technology
When it comes to performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 clearly leads with its advanced cushioning technologies. The FF BLAST PLUS foam is designed to provide cloud-like cushioning while being lighter than traditional options, making it suitable for runners who value both comfort and performance. The addition of the FLUIDRIDE outsole ensures smoother strides, enhancing the overall running experience.
In contrast, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0, while offering a comfortable ride, does not feature the same level of performance-oriented technology as the Gel-Excite 11. Its Cloudfoam midsole provides cushioning but primarily focuses on comfort for casual wearers rather than maximizing performance for serious running. Therefore, while both shoes serve their purpose, the Gel-Excite 11 is better suited for those looking to enhance their running experience with cutting-edge technology.
Style and Aesthetics
In terms of style, the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes present a sleek, modern look with a primarily black design complemented by core white accents. This aesthetic is versatile, allowing it to be worn in various casual settings beyond running. The emphasis on a minimalist design appeals to consumers who prefer understated yet stylish footwear.
Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features a more vibrant color scheme with dark pink clay and orange glow. This bold design is aimed at those who want their shoes to stand out, making them suitable for both workouts and casual outings. While both shoes offer attractive aesthetics, the choice between them may come down to personal style preference—subdued elegance versus bold vibrancy.
Price Consideration
The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 is priced at $57.00, making it the more budget-friendly option compared to the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11, which retails for $74.95. This represents a price difference of about 24%, making the Cloudfoam a compelling choice for those looking to save while still getting a quality running shoe.
However, it's essential to weigh the price against the features offered. The Gel-Excite 11, while pricier, provides advanced cushioning and support that may justify the expense for dedicated runners. Ultimately, consumers must consider their budget alongside their specific needs when selecting between these two options.
Brand Reputation and Sales Rank
Both adidas and ASICS are reputable brands in the athletic footwear market, known for their commitment to quality and performance. The adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 has a sales rank of 8845, indicating solid popularity in its category. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 boasts a higher sales rank of 2352, suggesting it may be a more favored choice among serious runners.
This difference in sales rank may influence consumer perception, as higher-ranked products are often seen as more desirable. However, personal preference and specific needs should ultimately guide the decision-making process when choosing between these two brands.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the adidas womens Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 Running Shoes and the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes depends largely on your priorities. If comfort, budget, and a casual aesthetic are your main concerns, the Cloudfoam Pure 2.0 at $57.00 is an excellent choice. However, if performance, advanced technology, and a vibrant design are what you seek, the Gel-Excite 11 at $74.95 may be worth the investment. Ultimately, both shoes cater to different needs, making your personal running style and preferences the key factors in your decision.

