Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, vs ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, wins on weight, ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark wins on cushioning and comfort.
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 offers a budget-friendly option with lightweight design, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 excels in cushioning and versatility.
Why Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, is better
Price
Adidas is $32.95 cheaper
Weight
Adidas weighs 8.7 ounces
Durability
Adidas features Adiwear outsole
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better
Cushioning
ASICS uses FF BLAST PLUS technology
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank of 2352
Versatility
ASICS is suitable for various fitness activities
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, | ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | ASICS |
| Model | Duramo SL 2.0 | Gel-Excite 11 |
| Upper | Mesh | Engineered Mesh |
| Outsole | Adiwear | FLUIDRIDE |
| Cushioning | LIGHTMOTION | AMPLIFOAM PLUS |
Dimension comparison
Overview of Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is priced at $42.00, making it about 44% less expensive than the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11, which costs $74.95. This price difference is significant for budget-conscious buyers looking for quality running shoes. Both models cater to women who are serious about their running routine, but their features and brand philosophies offer distinct advantages.
Design and Comfort
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running features a lightweight design with a synthetic and textile mesh upper, promoting breathability and comfort during runs. Weighing in at 8.7 ounces for a size 7, this shoe is built for short-to-mid distance training. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 incorporates engineered mesh that reduces the need for overlays, providing a lightweight and breathable experience as well. The ASICS model also utilizes PureGEL technology, offering a softer feel compared to standard GEL, which enhances comfort during longer runs.
Cushioning Technology
Cushioning is a crucial factor for runners, and both models deliver distinct cushioning technologies. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 features the innovative LIGHTMOTION midsole, which offers super-light cushioning and a responsive feel. This is ideal for runners seeking a springy underfoot experience. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 employs FF BLAST PLUS cushioning, providing a cloud-like feel while maintaining responsiveness. Additionally, it features AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which enhances comfort even further. Runners looking for a plush ride may prefer the ASICS model.
Durability
When it comes to durability, both shoes are equipped with high-quality outsoles. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 boasts an Adiwear outsole, designed for high-wear durability, ensuring that the shoe can withstand various terrains over time. Similarly, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 uses a FLUIDRIDE outsole that aids in creating smoother strides, contributing to the shoe’s longevity. Both brands promise durability, but the choice may come down to personal preference regarding traction and wear.
Fit and Sizing
Fit is essential for running shoes, and both models offer a tailored experience. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 is available in various sizes, including the popular size 7.5, ensuring a snug fit for most foot shapes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 also offers a variety of sizing options, including a wide fit, which is beneficial for runners with wider feet. Customers should consider trying both options to determine which fit aligns better with their comfort preferences.
Performance and Versatility
In terms of performance, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 is ideal for short-to-mid distance training, making it suitable for beginners and intermediate runners alike. Its lightweight construction supports speed and agility. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is designed for versatility, making it a great choice not only for running but also for gym workouts and other fitness routines. This may appeal to those looking for a multi-purpose shoe that can handle various activities.
Sales and Popularity
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 holds a sales rank of 26,907, indicating a moderate level of popularity among consumers. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 has a significantly better sales rank of 2,352, suggesting that it is a more sought-after option. This difference in popularity might reflect broader consumer confidence in ASICS shoes, possibly due to brand reputation or customer satisfaction.
Price Comparison
Price is a decisive factor when choosing running shoes, and the difference between these two models is quite notable. The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 is available for $42.00, making it approximately $32.95 cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11, which retails for $74.95. This price difference of about 44% could be a decisive factor for budget-conscious shoppers who still want quality running shoes.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 depends on individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize budget and lightweight design for short-to-mid distance runs, the Adidas model is a compelling option. However, if you seek advanced cushioning technology and versatility for various fitness activities, the ASICS model may justify its higher price point. Both offer unique advantages, but understanding your specific running needs will guide you to the right choice.

