Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, wins on weight, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on fit and comfort.
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is a budget-friendly option for beginners, while the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 offers premium comfort for serious runners.
Why Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, is better
Price
Adidas is significantly cheaper at $42.00.
Weight
Adidas weighs 8.7 ounces, making it lighter.
Target Audience
Adidas is ideal for beginners.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Comfort
Brooks features upgraded cushioning for long runs.
Performance
Brooks has APMA Seal of Acceptance for foot conditions.
Durability
Brooks is designed for high-mileage comfort.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running, | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | adidas | Brooks |
| Model | Duramo SL 2.0 | Glycerin 23 |
| Midsole | LIGHTMOTION | DNA TUNED |
| Upper | Mesh | Jacquard Knit |
| Sales Rank | 26907 | 4982 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is priced at $42.00, making it significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23, which retails for $159.99. This price difference of about 74% reflects the targeted audience and use cases for each shoe. The Adidas model is designed for short-to-mid distance training, while the Brooks shoe focuses on premium comfort for long runs and daily training.
Comfort and Fit
The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 is engineered for premium comfort with its upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole, offering more cushioning than its predecessor. This model is particularly suited for neutral runners, ensuring a plush ride with smooth transitions, which is ideal for long distances. In contrast, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running features a synthetic and textile mesh upper that provides lightweight comfort, but it may not match the luxurious feel and support of the Glycerin 23 for extended wear.
Performance and Durability
In terms of performance, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 excels with its zonal DNA TUNED cushioning that enhances soft landings and responsive toe-offs. This shoe is designed for high-mileage comfort and has been granted the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating its suitability for various foot conditions. On the other hand, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is tailored for shorter training sessions, offering a lightweight build and a durable Adiwear outsole that grips well on pavement or track but may not provide the same level of cushioning for long distances.
Weight and Build
The Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running weighs 8.7 ounces in size 7, making it a lightweight option for runners who prefer a less bulky shoe. This weight is optimal for short-to-mid distance training, where agility is key. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 does not specify its weight, but given its focus on cushioning and comfort, it is likely heavier than the Duramo SL 2.0. This difference may affect the decision for runners who prioritize speed versus those who seek comfort over longer distances.
Style and Aesthetics
Aesthetically, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running comes in a clean and versatile color scheme of White/Black/Dash Grey, appealing to those who prefer a more understated look. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 offers a more vibrant combination of White/Phantom/Cyber Pink, which may attract those looking for a shoe that stands out. Ultimately, style preference will play a significant role in the choice between these two models, though both brands are well-respected in the running community.
Target Audience
The target audience for the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running includes beginner runners or those focused on short-term goals, given its price point and design. Its lightweight structure makes it ideal for those who are just starting their training journey. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 caters to more experienced runners seeking a high-quality shoe for daily training and long runs. With a bestseller rank of 4982, it’s clear that the Glycerin 23 has garnered a loyal following, reflecting its reputation for quality and performance.
Pricing and Value
With a current price of $42.00, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running represents a budget-friendly choice, especially for those new to running. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23, priced at $159.99, is positioned as a premium product with features that justify its cost. This substantial price difference indicates that while the Duramo SL 2.0 is a great entry-level shoe, the Glycerin 23 aims to deliver superior comfort and support for serious runners.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 ultimately depends on your running needs and budget. If you are a beginner or looking for a shoe that is lightweight and affordable for short-to-mid distance runs, the Adidas Womens Duramo SL 2.0 Running is an excellent choice at $42.00. However, if you are a more experienced runner seeking premium comfort and support for longer distances, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23, despite its higher price of $159.99, may be worth the investment for its enhanced performance features.

