vsversusfinder

ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes Cushion vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes Cushion wins on price and weight, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on brand and cushioning.

The ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes offer great value and energy return, while the Brooks Glycerin 23 excels in plush cushioning and brand reputation.

Why ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes Cushion is better

Price

ALLSWIFIT is significantly cheaper at $63.97.

Weight

ALLSWIFIT weighs about 7.5 oz, enhancing agility.

Energy Return

ALLSWIFIT provides 67% energy return.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Cushioning

Brooks Glycerin 23 offers superior plush cushioning.

Brand Reputation

Brooks has a higher sales rank of 4,982.

Durability

Brooks is designed for high-mileage durability.

Overall score

ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes Cushion
75
Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
88

Specifications

SpecALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes CushionBrooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
Current Price$63.97$159.99
Sales Rank207714982
Arch SupportYesYes
Upper MaterialJacquardTriple Jacquard
Energy Return67%N/A

Dimension comparison

ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes CushionBrooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -

Design and Aesthetics

When it comes to design, ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes are lightweight and versatile, making them suitable for various activities. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 offers a more premium aesthetic with a focus on comfort and performance. The Glycerin 23 features a plush, engineered upper that adapts to the foot for a secure fit, while the ALLSWIFIT's airy Jacquard upper promotes airflow. The Glycerin 23's colorway of White/Phantom/Cyber Pink is visually appealing and designed to stand out, whereas the ALLSWIFIT offers a more understated style in white, making both shoes appealing but for different tastes.

Comfort and Fit

The comfort levels of these running shoes differ significantly. The Brooks Glycerin 23 is designed for neutral runners and emphasizes plush cushioning, thanks to its upgraded nitrogen-infused midsole. This shoe is ideal for long runs, providing a luxurious feel with every step. In contrast, the ALLSWIFIT shoes feature a mesh-covered EVA insole that offers arch support and reduces foot fatigue. While both shoes aim to provide comfort, the Glycerin 23 excels in cushioning and plushness, making it more suitable for those prioritizing long-distance runs.

Performance and Energy Return

In terms of performance, the ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes boast a thick supercritical foam midsole that provides an impressive 67 percent energy return. This feature helps in enhancing responsiveness and supporting a confident posture while running. Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin 23 features a zonal DNA tuned cushioning that creates softer landings and more responsive toe-offs, making it a solid choice for daily training. While both shoes offer excellent performance, the ALLSWIFIT's energy return is a standout feature for runners seeking to maximize their efficiency.

Weight and Agility

Weight is a crucial factor for runners who prefer agility. The ALLSWIFIT shoes weigh about 7.5 oz per shoe, contributing to a light and effortless running experience. This lightweight design allows for increased agility and speed during workouts. On the other hand, the weight of the Brooks Glycerin 23 is not explicitly stated, but it is generally heavier due to its premium cushioning and materials. Therefore, if you prioritize a lightweight shoe for speed, the ALLSWIFIT may be the better choice, while the Glycerin 23 focuses more on comfort and cushioning.

Price and Value

Price is a significant differentiator between these two options. The ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes are priced at $63.97, making them about 60% cheaper than the Brooks Glycerin 23, which retails for $159.99. This substantial price difference makes the ALLSWIFIT an appealing option for budget-conscious consumers who still want quality running shoes. However, the Glycerin 23 justifies its price through superior cushioning and overall performance, making it a worthwhile investment for serious runners.

Durability and Outsole Design

Both shoes are designed with durability in mind, but they approach it differently. The ALLSWIFIT shoes feature a wear-resistant rubber outsole that enhances traction and stability, making them suitable for slippery roads. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin 23’s wide platform and strategic midsole sculpting promote balanced movement and seamless transitions, which contribute to its longevity during high-mileage usage. While both products offer durable constructions, the Glycerin 23 is designed for those looking for high-performance durability over time, especially for daily training.

Brand Reputation and Sales Rank

The brand reputation plays a crucial role in consumer choice. ALLSWIFIT has a sales rank of 20,771, indicating a steady market presence, while Brooks holds a significantly higher rank of 4,982, reflecting its strong reputation and popularity among serious runners. This higher rank for Brooks suggests a broader acceptance in the running community and possibly more positive reviews regarding performance and comfort. Therefore, if brand reputation influences your decision, the Brooks Glycerin 23 may be the more reliable option.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the ALLSWIFIT Women's Road Running Shoes and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 boils down to your specific needs and budget. If you’re looking for a cost-effective, lightweight shoe that excels in energy return and versatility, the ALLSWIFIT is a fantastic choice at $63.97. However, if you prioritize plush cushioning, durability, and a strong brand reputation for long-distance running, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is worth the investment at $159.99. Each shoe has its strengths, making them suitable for different types of runners.