ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, leads on fit and breathability.
The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 offers a more budget-friendly option with a spacious fit, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 excels in cushioning and sustainability.
Why ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, is better
Price
ALTRA is $25 cheaper than ASICS
Fit
ALTRA offers a roomier toe box
Lightweight
ALTRA has a lighter midsole foam
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Cushioning
ASICS features advanced PureGEL technology
Sustainability
ASICS uses 75% recycled materials
Popularity
ASICS has a better sales rank
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, | ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ALTRA | ASICS |
| Weight | Light | Medium |
| Upper Material | Mesh | Jacquard |
| Midsole | Altra EGO P35 | FF BLAST PLUS ECO |
| Toe Box | Wide | Standard |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe is priced at $99.99, making it about 17% cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 Running Shoes, which retail for $124.95. This price difference may be significant for budget-conscious consumers looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. While both shoes are from reputable brands, the price point of the ALTRA shoe allows for a more economical choice, especially for those who don’t want to compromise on comfort and performance.
Comfort and Fit
In terms of comfort, both shoes offer distinct advantages. The ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 features a lightweight midsole foam known as Altra EGO P35, designed to provide an effortless underfoot feel. Its signature FootShape fit allows ample room for toe movement while ensuring a secure midfoot fit. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 27 boasts PureGEL technology for lightweight cushioning and FF BLAST PLUS ECO cushioning that enhances responsiveness. Each shoe prioritizes comfort, but the ALTRA shoe’s more spacious design may appeal to those with wider feet.
Performance Features
When it comes to performance features, the ALTRA Women’s Experience Flow 2 emphasizes a rocker shape that propels the runner forward with each step, facilitating an efficient toe-off. This design can be particularly beneficial for runners who want to maximize their speed and efficiency. In contrast, the ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 employs advanced materials like an engineered jacquard mesh upper and sustainable production methods, which contribute to both comfort and environmental responsibility. While both shoes excel in their performance features, the choice depends on whether the runner values propulsion or eco-friendly design.
Sustainability
Sustainability is a notable aspect of the ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27. At least 75% of its main upper material is made from recycled content, and the sockliner is produced using a dyeing process that significantly reduces water usage and carbon emissions. This focus on sustainability is increasingly important for eco-conscious consumers. While the ALTRA Women’s Experience Flow 2 does not highlight similar eco-friendly initiatives, its lightweight construction and performance-oriented design are aimed at reducing fatigue during long runs. For those prioritizing sustainability, the ASICS model stands out.
Aesthetic Appeal
In terms of aesthetic appeal, the ALTRA Women’s Experience Flow 2 comes in a light blue color, offering a fresh and vibrant look that may attract runners who prefer brighter footwear. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 is available in a more subdued black and lake grey combination, which may appeal to those looking for versatility in their running gear. The choice here is subjective and largely depends on personal style preferences, but both shoes are designed to be visually appealing while also serving their functional purpose.
Sales Ranking
The ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 currently holds a bestseller rank of 2393, indicating its popularity among consumers. In contrast, the ALTRA Women’s Experience Flow 2 has a higher sales rank of 17104, suggesting it may not be as widely purchased. This difference in sales rank can reflect brand loyalty, marketing effectiveness, or consumer preference for specific features. While the ASICS shoe has proven to be a favorite among buyers, the ALTRA shoe offers unique advantages that may appeal to a niche market of runners.
Brand Reputation
Both ALTRA and ASICS have established themselves as reputable brands in the running shoe market. ASICS, known for its advanced technology and performance-oriented designs, has a long-standing reputation among serious runners. The ALTRA brand, while newer, has gained a following for its focus on natural movement and comfort. Ultimately, brand loyalty may influence consumer decisions, but both brands deliver quality products that cater to different running needs and preferences.
Which should you buy?
In conclusion, choosing between the ALTRA Women’s Experience Flow 2 and the ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 27 depends on individual priorities. If budget and a roomier fit are your main concerns, the ALTRA shoe at $99.99 is a compelling choice. However, if you value advanced cushioning technology and sustainable materials, the ASICS model, priced at $124.95, may justify its higher cost. Both shoes offer quality and performance, but your decision should align with your specific running style and environmental values.

