vsversusfinder

ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, vs ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,

Updated August 2026 — ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, wins on style, ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on price and breathability.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 offers superior cushioning and breathability, making it a better choice for long-distance runners, while the ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 is more budget-friendly.

Why ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe, is better

Price

ALTRA is $99.99, significantly cheaper than ASICS at $169.95.

Weight

ALTRA is designed for a lightweight performance.

Fit

ALTRA's FootShape design allows for natural toe movement.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Cushioning

ASICS features advanced PureGEL and FF BLAST PLUS technology.

Breathability

ASICS has an engineered knit upper for better airflow.

Sales Rank

ASICS ranks higher at 11,265 compared to ALTRA's 17,104.

Overall score

ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe,
75
ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,
85

Specifications

SpecALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe,ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,
BrandALTRAASICS
Current Price$99.99$169.95
Sales Rank1710411265
Cushion TechAltra EGO P35PureGEL & FF BLAST PLUS
Upper MaterialStandardEngineered Knit

Dimension comparison

ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe,ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, 8.5,

Price Comparison

When comparing prices, the ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 Road Running Shoe is significantly cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 Running Shoes, costing $99.99 compared to $169.95. This makes the ALTRA about 41% less expensive than its competitor. For budget-conscious runners, this price difference could be a crucial factor. While the ASICS shoe offers advanced features, the ALTRA provides essential performance at a more accessible price point, making it appealing for those who prioritize affordability without sacrificing comfort.

Comfort and Fit

In terms of comfort, the ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 emphasizes a natural fit with its FootShape design, allowing plenty of room for toes to move freely. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners who may have wider feet or prefer a more natural running style. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is engineered with a breathable knit upper and offers a plush cushioning experience through its FF BLAST PLUS and PureGEL technologies. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the ASICS may be slightly ahead in terms of cushioning technology, particularly for those who run longer distances.

Cushioning Technology

Cushioning is a significant differentiator between these two shoes. The ALTRA features Altra EGO P35 midsole foam, designed for an efficient and comfortable feel underfoot. While this foam does provide a good level of cushioning, the ASICS boasts PureGEL technology, which is approximately 65% softer than standard GEL technology, as well as FF BLAST PLUS cushioning. This advanced technology aims to deliver a cloud-like experience with a responsive ride, making the ASICS a better option for runners seeking maximum cushioning and support during long runs.

Breathability

Breathability is another area where the ASICS Women’s Gel-Nimbus 28 shines due to its engineered knit upper, which promotes airflow and reduces heat buildup during runs. This feature is essential for runners who often tackle longer distances, as moisture management can significantly enhance comfort. The ALTRA shoe, while designed for a natural fit, does not highlight any specific breathability features. Consequently, runners looking for ventilation in their footwear may find the ASICS to be the superior choice in this category.

Weight and Performance

When it comes to weight, the ALTRA is built with a lightweight structure, enhancing its performance for those looking for speed and agility. However, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 has also made strides in reducing weight, being approximately 25 grams lighter than its predecessor. This reduction contributes to a more responsive running experience. While both shoes aim for performance, the ALTRA may appeal more to those prioritizing a lightweight option and a natural stride, whereas the ASICS targets those looking for a balance of weight and cushioning.

Style and Aesthetics

In terms of style, both shoes feature appealing designs that cater to different tastes. The ALTRA Women’s Experience Flow 2 comes in a light blue colorway, providing a fresh and vibrant look. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 is available in a more muted Mineral Beige/Cream combination, which may appeal to those who prefer a classic aesthetic. Ultimately, personal preference will dictate which style resonates more, but both brands have successfully created visually appealing footwear.

Sales Rank and Popularity

Popularity can often indicate quality, and in this comparison, the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 holds a better sales rank at 11,265, compared to the ALTRA's rank of 17,104. This suggests that the ASICS may be a more popular choice among consumers, potentially due to its advanced features and reputation for comfort. However, it’s important to note that both products are well-regarded in the running community, and the ALTRA’s lower price may attract a different segment of runners who are looking for value.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ALTRA Women's Experience Flow 2 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Nimbus 28 ultimately comes down to individual needs and preferences. If you are looking for a more cost-effective option without compromising too much on comfort, the ALTRA is an excellent choice at $99.99. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning technology and breathability for longer runs, the ASICS, priced at $169.95, may be worth the investment. Consider your running style, budget, and personal preferences to make the best decision for your running experience.