ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on support and breathability.
The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA offers a more budget-friendly option with a focus on natural stride, while the Brooks Women's Glycerin 22 excels in advanced cushioning technology and style.
Why ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 is better
Price
ALTRA is $15 cheaper than Brooks
Weight
ALTRA is lighter due to its design
Foot Health
Both have APMA Seal, but ALTRA emphasizes natural stride
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks features advanced DNA Tuned cushioning
Sales Rank
Brooks has a better bestseller rank
Design
Brooks offers a more vibrant color scheme
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ALTRA | Brooks |
| Model | FWD VIA | Glycerin 22 |
| Midsole | Altra EGO FLO | DNA Tuned |
| APMA Seal | Yes | Yes |
| Support | Neutral | Neutral |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe is priced at $99.97, making it about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22, which retails for $114.95. When considering running shoes, price is often a significant factor for buyers, and this difference could influence budget-conscious consumers. The lower price of the ALTRA shoe might appeal to those looking for a quality running shoe without a hefty investment, while the Brooks shoe, although pricier, may justify its cost through advanced features.
Brand Reputation
Both ALTRA and Brooks are reputable brands in the running shoe industry. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 holds a notable bestseller rank of 844, indicating strong sales and popularity among consumers. This model has been recognized with the APMA Seal of Acceptance, signifying its commitment to foot health. The ALTRA Women’s FWD VIA also boasts the same seal, suggesting it promotes good foot health. Both brands have established themselves as trustworthy options for runners, but Brooks has a proven track record of bestsellers.
Comfort and Cushioning
The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA emphasizes comfort with its Altra EGO FLO supercritical midsole foam, providing a soft underfoot feel. This shoe is designed to facilitate a natural stride while offering a lightweight experience. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 features advanced DNA Tuned cushioning that combines dual-size cells for luxurious cushioning and energetic toe-offs. This model is structured for smooth transitions, making it ideal for various activities beyond running. While both shoes offer comfort, the Brooks shoe may provide a more sophisticated cushioning technology.
Design and Aesthetics
Aesthetic appeal can greatly influence a buyer's choice. The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA is presented in a light gray color, which gives it a sleek and neutral look suitable for various outfits. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 features a vibrant color combination of white, limpet shell, and amparo blue, which may attract runners looking for a stylish option. While both shoes are designed for functionality, Brooks appears to offer a more eye-catching design that could appeal to fashion-forward consumers.
Fit and Sizing
The ALTRA Women’s FWD VIA and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 both come in size 8.5, catering to a common size preference among female runners. The ALTRA shoe’s rocker shape promotes a natural gait, which is essential for comfort during long runs. On the other hand, the Brooks shoe features a newly engineered double jacquard knit upper that provides a flexible and accommodating fit, enhancing overall comfort. Runners who prioritize a snug yet breathable fit may find the Brooks model more appealing.
Performance on Different Surfaces
When it comes to performance, the ALTRA Women’s FWD VIA is specifically designed for road running, ensuring it performs well on hard surfaces. Its propulsion-focused design supports a natural stride and efficient toe-off. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22, while also suitable for road running, offers versatility for cross-training and gym activities, thanks to its neutral support and maximum cushioning. Therefore, runners who primarily run on roads may prefer the ALTRA shoe, while those seeking a multi-purpose shoe may lean toward the Brooks.
Health Benefits
Both shoes have received the APMA Seal of Acceptance, which means they promote good foot health. The ALTRA Women’s FWD VIA is designed to support a healthy foot position, crucial for long-distance runners. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 also enhances foot health with its neutral support and cutting-edge cushioning technology. This recognition is essential for consumers concerned with the long-term impact of their footwear on foot health, making both options favorable choices.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 ultimately depends on your personal preferences and needs. If you are looking for a more budget-friendly option with a focus on natural stride and road running, the ALTRA shoe at $99.97 is an excellent choice. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning technology and a stylish design, the Brooks shoe at $114.95 may be worth the extra investment. Consider your running habits, budget, and aesthetic preferences to make the best decision for your footwear needs.

