ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - leads on durability and cushioning.
The Brooks Glycerin 23 offers superior cushioning and performance, making it the better choice for serious runners, while the ALTRA FWD VIA is a budget-friendly option with good health benefits.
Why ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 is better
Price
ALTRA FWD VIA is $99.97, cheaper than Glycerin 23 at $159.99.
Health Focus
ALTRA FWD VIA emphasizes comfort and health with APMA Seal.
Lightweight
ALTRA FWD VIA features a lightweight design with Altra EGO FLO foam.
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Glycerin 23 has upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole.
Fit
Glycerin 23 features a plush, engineered upper for better adaptability.
Sales Rank
Glycerin 23 has a higher sales rank of 4,982 compared to 23,294.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe, Light Gray, 8.5 | Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ALTRA | Brooks |
| Model | FWD VIA | Glycerin 23 |
| Weight | Light | Moderate |
| Midsole | Altra EGO FLO | DNA TUNED |
| Upper | Standard | Engineered |
| APMA Seal | Yes | Yes |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe is significantly more budget-friendly than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23, priced at $99.97 compared to $159.99. This makes the ALTRA shoe about 38% cheaper than its competitor. If you're looking for a running shoe that offers decent performance without breaking the bank, the FWD VIA is a compelling option. However, the higher price of the Glycerin 23 reflects its premium features, which may appeal to dedicated runners willing to invest in superior cushioning and comfort.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort and cushioning, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 takes the lead with its upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole, which offers enhanced cushioning by 2mm in the forefoot. This feature is designed to provide softer landings and more responsive toe-offs, making it ideal for long runs and daily training. Conversely, the ALTRA FWD VIA utilizes Altra EGO FLO supercritical midsole foam, which ensures a lightweight and soft feel underfoot. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Glycerin 23's advanced cushioning technology might make it the better choice for runners who prioritize plush comfort during extended wear.
Fit and Design
In terms of fit and design, the Brooks Glycerin 23 features a newly enhanced triple jacquard warp-knit upper that offers a plush, comfortable fit with the right balance of stretch and structure. This design minimizes pressure points, making it suitable for long-distance runs. The ALTRA FWD VIA also boasts a unique rocker shape that propels the runner forward and provides an efficient toe-off. While both designs aim to provide a secure fit, the Glycerin 23's engineered upper may offer more adaptability for various foot shapes, making it a more versatile option.
Performance and Responsiveness
The Brooks Glycerin 23 is geared toward neutral runners seeking a smooth performance, emphasizing fluid transitions and balanced movement. Its wide platform allows for seamless heel-to-toe transitions, which can enhance overall running efficiency. On the other hand, the ALTRA FWD VIA focuses on promoting a natural stride with its rocker design. While both shoes perform well, the Glycerin 23's features may be more appealing for those focused on performance during long or competitive runs, whereas the FWD VIA might suit casual runners looking for comfort.
Durability
When evaluating durability, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is built to handle high mileage, offering a soft yet resilient trainer that doesn’t sacrifice stability. Its premium midsole package ensures that it remains effective over time, even with intense use. The ALTRA FWD VIA, while also durable, does not emphasize longevity in its features. Instead, it focuses more on comfort and health, as evidenced by its APMA Seal of Acceptance. For runners who put in many miles, the Glycerin 23 may provide better long-term value due to its emphasis on durability.
Health Considerations
Both shoes have received the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) Seal of Acceptance, indicating that they promote good foot health. This makes them suitable options for runners concerned about foot issues. The ALTRA FWD VIA specifically highlights its health benefits, focusing on comfort and a natural stride. The Brooks Glycerin 23, meanwhile, is also a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, making it a more specialized choice for those with specific health needs. If foot health is a primary concern, both shoes offer commendable features, but the Glycerin 23 may be more beneficial for individuals with specific foot conditions.
Popularity and Sales Rank
In terms of popularity, the Brooks Glycerin 23 ranks significantly higher with a sales rank of 4,982, compared to the ALTRA FWD VIA's rank of 23,294. This suggests that the Glycerin 23 is favored among consumers, likely due to its established reputation for comfort and performance. While the ALTRA FWD VIA is a solid choice, it may not have the same level of recognition in the market. If you prefer a shoe that many runners trust and have validated through sales, the Glycerin 23 may be the preferable option.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ALTRA Women's FWD VIA Road Running Shoe and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize budget, comfort, and health benefits, the FWD VIA is an excellent choice at $99.97. However, if you’re looking for superior cushioning, a premium fit, and overall performance for longer runs, the Glycerin 23, despite its higher price of $159.99, may be worth the investment. The decision should align with your running habits and what features matter most to you.

