ALTRA Women's Torin 8 Road Running Shoe, Black, 8.5 vs ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark leads on style and comfort.
The ALTRA Women's Torin 8 offers premium cushioning and foot health benefits, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 provides excellent value and versatility. Choose based on your priorities.
Why ALTRA Women's Torin 8 Road Running Shoe, Black, 8.5 is better
Foot Health
ALTRA has the APMA Seal of Acceptance.
Cushioning
ALTRA features Balanced Cushioning.
Toe Box
ALTRA has a spacious FootShape toe box.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better
Price
ASICS is $41.04 cheaper.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank of 2,352.
Breathability
ASICS has an engineered mesh upper.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ALTRA Women's Torin 8 Road Running Shoe, Black, 8.5 | ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ALTRA | ASICS |
| Model | Torin 8 | Gel-Excite 11 |
| Weight | Not Specified | Lightweight |
| Technology | Balanced Cushioning | FF BLAST PLUS |
| Toe Box | FootShape | Standard |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
The ALTRA Women's Torin 8 Road Running Shoe is priced at $115.99, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes are significantly cheaper at $74.95, making them about 35% less expensive. This price difference of $41.04 could be a deciding factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for reliable running shoes. Both products fall within the running shoes category, appealing to different segments of the market. The ALTRA option is positioned as a premium choice, while the ASICS shoe offers a more budget-friendly alternative without sacrificing essential performance features.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, the ALTRA Women's Torin 8 emphasizes its signature Balanced Cushioning and FootShape toe box, designed to promote proper, low-impact running form. This shoe received the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) Seal of Acceptance, indicating its commitment to foot health. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and PureGEL technology, providing a blend of softness and responsiveness for a comfortable ride. While both shoes prioritize cushioning, the ALTRA shoe focuses on foot health while the ASICS shoe offers a responsive experience, appealing to different preferences.
Weight and Breathability
Weight and breathability play crucial roles in running shoe performance. The ALTRA Women's Torin 8 is not specifically mentioned for its weight, but its design suggests a focus on comfort over minimalism. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11, however, boasts an engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability, potentially keeping your feet cooler during runs. The lightweight design is complemented by the midsole cushioning technology, making it ideal for longer runs. For runners who prioritize a lightweight and breathable option, the ASICS may have the edge, while ALTRA is tailored for those who prefer more structure.
Fit and Sizing
Fit is vital when selecting running shoes, and each brand has its unique approach. The ALTRA Women's Torin 8 features a FootShape toe box that allows for natural toe splay, which could be beneficial for runners with wider feet. Meanwhile, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is available in wide sizes, catering to various foot shapes. This inclusivity means that both products can accommodate different preferences effectively. However, runners who value a more spacious toe area might lean towards the ALTRA shoe, while those needing a standard fit will find the ASICS appealing.
Performance on Different Surfaces
The performance of running shoes can vary depending on the terrain. The ALTRA Women's Torin 8 is designed for road running, emphasizing a low-impact form that can be beneficial on hard surfaces. Conversely, the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features a FLUIDRIDE outsole that enhances stride smoothness, making it suitable for various running conditions, including light trails. For urban runners focused solely on pavement, the ALTRA may provide better support, while the ASICS offers versatility across different surfaces.
Style and Aesthetics
In terms of style, the ALTRA Women's Torin 8 comes in a sleek black design that appeals to those who prefer a classic look. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11, with its dark pink clay and orange glow color scheme, targets runners looking for something more vibrant and eye-catching. Aesthetics can be a significant factor for many buyers, as the visual appeal of a shoe often influences purchasing decisions. Depending on personal style preferences, customers may gravitate towards one shoe over the other.
Brand Reputation and Trust
Both ALTRA and ASICS are reputable brands in the running community, but they attract different types of runners. ALTRA is known for its focus on foot health and natural running mechanics, appealing to those who prioritize a holistic approach to running. Meanwhile, ASICS has a long-standing reputation for producing high-performance athletic footwear, making it a trusted choice among competitive and casual runners alike. The ALTRA Women's Torin 8 holds a sales rank of 11,893, while the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is a bestseller with a rank of 2,352. This suggests that the ASICS shoe has a broader appeal and may be a more popular choice among consumers.
Which should you buy?
Ultimately, the choice between the ALTRA Women's Torin 8 and the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 hinges on individual preferences and priorities. If you value premium cushioning, foot health, and a spacious toe box, the ALTRA may be the better option for you. However, if you are looking for a more affordable shoe with versatile performance and a stylish design, the ASICS is a compelling choice. The ALTRA comes at a higher price point, while the ASICS provides excellent value for money without compromising on essential features. Your decision should reflect your running style, budget, and comfort needs.

