ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, wins on breathability and style, ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, wins on comfort and cushioning.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers better value and comfort for casual runners, while the Gel-Pulse 17 provides advanced features for serious runners.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better
price
Gel-Contend 9 is $5 cheaper
flexibility
Gel-Contend 9 has flex grooves for better movement
sales rank
Gel-Contend 9 has a higher sales rank
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, is better
cushioning
AMPLIFOAM PLUS offers superior comfort
moisture management
OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite sockliner for better breathability
durability
higher stack height for enhanced impact absorption
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, | ASICS Women's Gel-Pulse 17 Running Shoes, 9, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | ASICS |
| Model | Gel-Contend 9 | Gel-Pulse 17 |
| Upper | Jacquard mesh | Mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic rubber | Molded rubber |
| Sockliner | OrthoLite | OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite |
Dimension comparison
Overview of the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and Gel-Pulse 17
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and Gel-Pulse 17 offer unique features aimed at enhancing running experiences. The Gel-Contend 9 is priced at $64.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the Gel-Pulse 17, which retails for $69.95. While both shoes are designed for comfort and support, they cater to different preferences and needs for runners.
Design and Comfort
The Gel-Contend 9 features a jacquard mesh upper that improves airflow, making it suitable for warmer conditions. This model emphasizes comfort through its EVA insole and Amplifoam cushioning, ensuring a softer footstrike. In contrast, the Gel-Pulse 17 includes a mesh upper as well but enhances comfort with AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning that offers a softer ride than standard options. Both shoes incorporate rearfoot GEL technology for impact absorption, but the Gel-Pulse 17 also boasts an OrthoLite Hybrid Max Lite sockliner for advanced moisture management, which might appeal to those concerned about foot perspiration during long runs.
Performance and Support
When it comes to performance, the Gel-Contend 9 is designed with flex grooves in the outsole, which provide improved flexibility during movement. This feature can make a noticeable difference for runners who require a natural gait. On the other hand, the Gel-Pulse 17 is equipped with a molded rubber outsole, contributing to its durability and stability. Although both shoes provide support, the Gel-Pulse 17's additional focus on shock absorption with AMPLIFOAM PLUS may offer an edge for those running longer distances or on uneven terrain.
Durability
Durability is an essential factor for any running shoe. The Gel-Contend 9 is constructed with a synthetic rubber outsole that delivers stability across various terrains. This makes it a reliable choice for casual runners or those who may encounter different surfaces. The Gel-Pulse 17, with its reinforced midsole and higher stack height, aims for long-lasting performance by enhancing impact absorption. While both shoes are built to withstand regular use, the Gel-Pulse 17's additional features potentially make it a better investment over time for more serious runners.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is crucial in running shoes, especially during warmer months. The Gel-Contend 9's jacquard mesh upper allows for optimal airflow, which is beneficial for maintaining comfort during runs. The Gel-Pulse 17 also includes a mesh upper but is designed with no-sew details for a more customized fit. This could appeal to runners who prioritize a snug feel without sacrificing breathability. Ultimately, both shoes provide good ventilation, but the Gel-Pulse 17's fit enhancements may cater better to those seeking a tailored experience.
Price Comparison
Pricing can be a significant factor in deciding between the two models. The Gel-Contend 9 is currently priced at $64.95, while the Gel-Pulse 17 is available for $69.95. This makes the Gel-Contend 9 approximately $5 cheaper, or about 7% less expensive. For budget-conscious consumers or casual runners, this price difference may be a compelling reason to choose the Gel-Contend 9. However, those willing to invest a little more for enhanced features might find the Gel-Pulse 17 worth the additional cost.
Popularity and Sales Rank
In terms of popularity, the Gel-Contend 9 holds a sales rank of 1155, indicating a strong presence in the market. In contrast, the Gel-Pulse 17 has a sales rank of 12467, suggesting that while it is still a viable option, it may not be as widely favored among consumers. This difference in sales rank can provide insight into consumer preferences and the effectiveness of each shoe's design and marketing. The Gel-Contend 9's higher ranking may reflect its appeal to a broader audience seeking reliable performance at a competitive price.
Which should you buy?
Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and Gel-Pulse 17 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If budget is your primary concern, the Gel-Contend 9 offers excellent value at $64.95 while still delivering comfort and support. However, if you are looking for advanced features such as AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning and better moisture management, the Gel-Pulse 17 at $69.95 may be worth the extra investment. Both shoes provide the essential elements of a good running shoe, but the right choice hinges on personal preferences for fit, performance, and price.

