vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive

Updated August 2026 — Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive leads on price and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers a budget-friendly option with decent comfort, while the Brooks Women's Adrenaline GTS 24 excels in advanced cushioning and support features.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better

Price

ASICS is $34 cheaper.

Weight

ASICS is lighter for casual runs.

Color Options

ASICS offers a vibrant color scheme.

Why Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive is better

Cushioning

Brooks features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning.

Support

Brooks has the Guiderails Holistic Support System.

Durability

Brooks is certified as a PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,
75
Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGel-Contend 9Adrenaline GTS 24
UpperJacquard meshEngineered air mesh
TechnologyRearfoot GELDNA Loft v3
FlexibilityFlex groovesSmooth transitions

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive

Pricing Comparison

When it comes to pricing, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes are significantly more affordable than the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 Supportive Running Shoe. The ASICS shoes retail for $64.95, whereas the Brooks model is priced at $98.95, making the Brooks about 53% more expensive. This price difference may be a critical factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort and cushioning, both shoes offer impressive technologies tailored for running enthusiasts. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 features rearfoot GEL technology that enhances impact absorption, providing a softer footstrike. Additionally, the Ortholite sockliner adds to the step-in comfort, essential for longer runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 boasts nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, designed for plush comfort while adapting to individual strides. While both provide excellent cushioning, the Brooks model emphasizes a lightweight feel, making it ideal for runners who prioritize a cloud-like experience.

Breathability and Upper Design

Breathability is a key feature in running shoes, and both models excel in this area. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 has a jacquard mesh upper, which enhances airflow and keeps the foot cool during runs. This can be particularly beneficial in warmer climates or during intense workouts. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 comes with an engineered air mesh upper that not only provides breathability but also offers the right amount of stretch and structure for a comfortable fit. Both shoes ensure good ventilation, but the Brooks shoe's added stretch may offer a more accommodating fit for various foot shapes.

Support and Stability

Support and stability are essential for preventing injuries during runs, and both shoes offer distinctive solutions. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 incorporates synthetic stitching on the overlays to improve support, coupled with flex grooves in the outsole to enhance flexibility. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is equipped with the Guiderails Holistic Support System, which helps maintain natural motion while controlling excess movement. This advanced system may be particularly beneficial for runners seeking additional support, especially those who overpronate.

Weight and Performance

Weight can significantly impact running performance, and here the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 may have the edge. Although specific weight details are not provided, the Brooks model is designed with nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 foam, which is known for being lightweight while still offering plush cushioning. The ASICS Women’s Gel-Contend 9, while also designed for comfort, may not match the Brooks in terms of lightweight feel. Runners focused on speed may prefer the Brooks for its potential performance benefits.

Durability

Durability is a crucial aspect for any running shoe, and both models are built to last. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 features a synthetic rubber outsole with Trusstic Technology, which enhances stability and durability across various terrains. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, indicating a level of durability and support that meets specific health standards. The Brooks model may appeal more to those seeking a shoe with a proven track record of longevity, especially for regular runners.

Aesthetics and Style

In terms of aesthetics, both shoes have unique styles that cater to different tastes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 comes in a Lilac HINT/Bluebell color scheme that adds a pop of color to any running outfit. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 is available in a classic Black/Black/Ebony, making it versatile and easy to pair with various athletic apparel. While the ASICS may attract those looking for a vibrant look, the Brooks offers a more understated and timeless aesthetic.

Which should you buy?

Deciding between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the Brooks Women’s Adrenaline GTS 24 ultimately comes down to your specific needs and budget. If you are looking for a budget-friendly option that provides comfort and decent support, the ASICS model is priced at $64.95, making it an attractive choice. Conversely, if you prioritize advanced cushioning and support features, the Brooks model, despite its higher price tag of $98.95, may be worth the investment. Both shoes have their strengths, so consider what aspects are most important for your running experience before making a decision.