vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, wins on flexibility and cushioning, Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on price.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers better value with superior cushioning and breathability, while the Brooks Women's Anthem 7 provides a lightweight option with smooth transitions.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better

Price

ASICS is $20 cheaper than Brooks

Cushioning

ASICS features rearfoot GEL technology for better impact absorption

Flexibility

ASICS includes flex grooves for natural foot movement

Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Weight

Brooks is lighter for easier running

Design

Brooks has a classic and versatile color scheme

Smooth Transitions

Brooks features a Segmented Crash Pad for efficient movement

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,
85
Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -
BrandASICSBrooks
ModelGel-Contend 9Anthem 7
Sales Rank11553377
Upper MaterialJacquard MeshEngineered Air Mesh
OutsoleSynthetic RubberRubber

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes are priced at $64.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 Neutral Running Shoe, which retails for $84.93. This price difference may be a significant factor for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes without breaking the bank. While both shoes offer impressive features, the cost-effectiveness of the ASICS model could sway those who prioritize value for money in their footwear choices.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 excels with its rearfoot GEL technology cushioning, which enhances impact absorption and provides a softer feeling at footstrike. The Ortholite sockliner adds to this comfort, ensuring a cushioned experience with every step. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 features lightweight DNA midsole cushioning designed to decrease underfoot pressure, providing an effortless run. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the ASICS model offers additional features that may appeal to those who require extra cushioning during their runs.

Breathability

Breathability is a critical factor for running shoes, and both the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 have unique designs to enhance airflow. The ASICS model incorporates a jacquard mesh upper that improves airflow, ensuring your feet stay cool during your runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Anthem 7 features an engineered air mesh upper that balances stretch and structure for increased comfort and breathability. While both shoes excel in this area, the ASICS model's specific focus on improving airflow could be a decisive factor for runners in warmer climates.

Durability

Durability is vital for any running shoe, and both the ASICS and Brooks models are designed to withstand regular use. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 features a synthetic rubber outsole with Trusstic Technology, which provides exceptional stability across various terrains. This makes it a solid choice for those who may encounter different surfaces during their runs. Conversely, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 is constructed with a synthetic mesh upper and nylon lining that offer support while maintaining breathability. While both shoes are durable, the ASICS model's focus on stability may give it an edge for runners tackling varied terrains.

Flexibility

Flexibility is another important aspect when choosing running shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 includes flex grooves in the outsole that enhance flexibility, allowing for a more natural foot movement. This feature is particularly beneficial for runners looking for a more dynamic running experience. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 utilizes a Segmented Crash Pad that adapts to the foot's landing, promoting smooth transitions and efficient movement. While both shoes offer flexibility, the ASICS model may be better suited for runners who prioritize natural foot movement.

Style and Aesthetics

In terms of style, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 sports a lilac and bluebell color scheme that appeals to those looking for vibrant and fresh designs. The sleek polyester upper contributes to its modern aesthetic. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 presents a more understated design with its white, black, and tan color combination, providing versatility for casual wear as well as running. Style preferences are subjective, but the ASICS model may attract those who favor a bolder look, while the Brooks could appeal to those who prefer a classic, understated appearance.

Popularity and Sales Rank

The sales rank can often indicate the popularity of a product among consumers. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 holds a sales rank of 1155, suggesting it is a favored option within the running shoe category. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 has a sales rank of 3377, indicating a slightly lower level of popularity. While both shoes have their merits, the higher sales rank of the ASICS model may suggest it is a more trusted choice among runners.

Which should you buy?

In conclusion, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 7 ultimately comes down to personal preferences and priorities. If you are looking for a more affordable option with superior impact absorption, breathability, and flexibility, the ASICS model is a compelling choice at $64.95. However, if you prefer a lightweight shoe that ensures smooth transitions with a classic design, the Brooks model, priced at $84.93, may be worth the investment. Each shoe has its strengths, so consider your running style and needs before making a decision.