ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe -
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, leads on support and flexibility.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers better value and comfort for budget-conscious runners, while the Brooks Women's Anthem 8 provides enhanced cushioning and fit for those willing to spend more.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better
Price
ASICS is $25 cheaper than Brooks
Comfort
ASICS features rearfoot GEL technology for better impact absorption
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank at 1155 compared to Brooks at 4355
Why Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - is better
Cushioning
Brooks has upgraded DNA LOFT v2 midsole foam
Fit
Brooks offers a more tailored fit with its performance mesh upper
Transitions
Brooks promotes smoother heel-to-toe transitions
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, | Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe - |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Brooks |
| Model | Gel-Contend 9 | Anthem 8 |
| Upper | Jacquard mesh | Performance mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic rubber | RoadTack rubber |
| Cushioning | Rearfoot GEL | DNA LOFT v2 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes are priced at $64.95, making them a budget-friendly option for runners. With a sales rank of 1155, they are well-received among users. The shoe features rearfoot GEL technology, which enhances impact absorption, providing a softer footstrike. Additionally, the jacquard mesh upper improves airflow, making these shoes suitable for warmer runs. The combination of an EVA insole and Amplifoam cushioning ensures comfort for everyday use, while the synthetic rubber outsole contributes to stability across various terrains.
Overview of Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe
In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 Neutral Running Shoe is priced higher at $89.95, approximately 38% more than the ASICS option. With a sales rank of 4355, it is also a popular choice among runners. This shoe is designed for budget-conscious individuals and beginners, offering soft DNA LOFT v2 midsole foam, which enhances cushioning. It also promotes smooth heel-to-toe transitions thanks to its engineered midsole geometry. The lightweight performance mesh upper ensures breathability and a secure fit, making it ideal for casual fitness routines or daily walks.
Comfort and Cushioning Comparison
The comfort level of the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is remarkable, thanks to its rearfoot GEL technology, which absorbs impact effectively. The Ortholite sockliner further enhances the comfort, providing a soft step-in feel. This shoe is designed to offer a comfortable experience during long runs or walks.
On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 provides upgraded cushioning with 2mm more DNA LOFT v2 midsole foam compared to its predecessor. This feature aims to deliver a softer and more balanced experience underfoot, making it suitable for various activities, from casual runs to daily workouts. Both shoes prioritize comfort, but the Brooks’ additional cushioning may appeal to those who prefer a plush ride.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is a key feature in both models. The ASICS Gel-Contend 9 boasts a jacquard mesh upper that promotes airflow, keeping feet cool during warm-weather activities. This design helps to prevent overheating, making them a practical choice for summer runs.
In contrast, the Brooks Anthem 8 also emphasizes breathability with its lightweight performance mesh upper. This feature not only improves airflow but also conforms to the foot shape for a secure fit. Both shoes excel in breathability, but the Brooks may provide a more tailored fit due to its design.
Durability and Outsole Performance
Durability is essential for running shoes, and both options offer reliable outsoles. The ASICS Gel-Contend 9 features a synthetic rubber outsole with Trusstic Technology, enhancing stability and durability across various terrains. This aspect is particularly beneficial for runners who frequently encounter uneven surfaces.
Conversely, the Brooks Anthem 8 utilizes a RoadTack rubber outsole, which is designed to provide traction on city streets and suburban sidewalks. This outsole material enhances durability while keeping the shoe lightweight. While both shoes are built to last, the ASICS may have an edge in terms of stability due to its specialized technology.
Target Audience and Usage
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is suitable for a broad audience, especially those who value comfort and stability. Its features make it an excellent choice for casual runners and individuals looking for a dependable everyday shoe.
The Brooks Women’s Anthem 8, however, is specifically targeted at budget-conscious runners and beginners. With its soft cushioning and smooth transitions, it is designed to ease newcomers into performance running. Both shoes cater to different user needs, but the Brooks may be more appealing to those starting their running journey.
Price Comparison
Pricing is a significant factor when choosing between these two options. The ASICS Gel-Contend 9 is available for $64.95, making it about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Anthem 8, which retails for $89.95. This price difference may influence budget-conscious buyers who are looking for quality without breaking the bank.
While the Brooks offers advanced cushioning and fit, the ASICS presents a more economical choice for those who prioritize value over cutting-edge technology. Both shoes provide excellent features for their respective prices, but the ASICS may be more attractive for those on a tighter budget.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the Brooks Women’s Anthem 8 ultimately depends on your personal preferences and needs. If you prioritize comfort, breathability, and a lower price point, the ASICS option may be the better choice for you. However, if you are willing to invest a bit more for enhanced cushioning and a more tailored fit, the Brooks could be worth the extra cost. Both shoes offer excellent features and serve different types of runners, so consider what aspects matter most to you before making your decision.

