vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running &

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, wins on breathability, Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & wins on support and fit.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers great value and comfort for budget-conscious runners, while the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 excels in support and stability. Choose based on your specific needs.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better

Price

ASICS is significantly cheaper at $64.95.

Breathability

ASICS features a jacquard mesh upper for better airflow.

Weight

ASICS is likely lighter, enhancing performance for casual runners.

Why Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running & is better

Support

Brooks offers advanced GuideRails technology for stability.

Cushioning

Brooks uses nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 for superior comfort.

Certification

Brooks is a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,
75
Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running &
88

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running &
CushioningRearfoot GELDNA Loft v3
Upper MaterialJacquard MeshEngineered Upper
Sales Rank11553616
FlexibilityGoodExcellent
StabilityModerateHigh

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 Supportive Running &

Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9, priced at $64.95, offers a perfect blend of comfort and style for runners seeking an affordable option. This shoe features rearfoot GEL technology, which enhances impact absorption and provides a softer footstrike, making it suitable for those who prioritize comfort during their runs.

Crafted with a jacquard mesh upper, the Gel-Contend 9 ensures excellent airflow and breathability, while the OrthoLite sockliner adds an extra layer of comfort. With flex grooves in the outsole designed to improve flexibility, these shoes are built to accommodate various terrains. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 boasts a bestseller rank of 1155, indicating its popularity among consumers.

Overview of Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24

The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 is a premium supportive running and walking shoe priced at $119.95, making it about 84% more expensive than the ASICS model. This shoe is designed for maximum support and comfort, featuring nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning that adapts to your stride for enhanced durability.

A key highlight is the GuideRails technology, which helps maintain your natural motion path and limits excess joint movement, catering to those who may require additional stability. The Ariel GTS 24 is also recognized as a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe and has received the APMA Seal of Acceptance. With a bestseller rank of 3616, it still holds a respectable position in the market.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 utilizes rearfoot GEL technology and Amplifoam cushioning, providing a plush feel at footstrike. The OrthoLite sockliner further enhances the comfort level, making it a great option for long runs or walks.

In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 features nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, which is designed to deliver soft and durable comfort. This shoe's cushioning adapts to the unique stride of the wearer, making it ideal for those who prioritize long-lasting support during their activities. While both shoes focus on comfort, the Brooks model offers a more advanced cushioning system, justifying its higher price point.

Support and Stability

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 provides adequate support through its synthetic stitching overlays and flexible outsole, making it suitable for various running surfaces. The shoe's design incorporates features that improve stability, although it may not be specifically tailored for those requiring significant motion control.

On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 excels in stability with its linear last construction, designed to support the foot effectively. The GuideRails holistic support system works to keep the body in its natural motion path, reducing the risk of injury during runs. For runners needing extra support, the Brooks model clearly stands out, especially for those with specific biomechanical needs.

Breathability and Upper Design

Breathability is a key factor in running shoe performance, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 shines with its jacquard mesh upper. This material promotes airflow, helping to keep the feet cool during workouts. The shoe's upper is built to offer durability without compromising on ventilation.

The Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24, while also designed for comfort, focuses on a secure fit with its engineered upper. Though comfort is prioritized, the Brooks model does not emphasize breathability to the same extent as the ASICS shoe. For runners who value ventilation, the Gel-Contend 9 may be the more suitable choice.

Weight and Performance

In terms of weight, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is likely lighter, as it is marketed as a more budget-friendly option focused on comfort without adding excessive features that might increase weight. This can enhance performance for casual runners or those seeking a lightweight shoe for everyday wear.

Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24, designed for maximum support and stability, may be heavier due to its robust construction and cushioning technology. This weight could be a consideration for runners looking for speed over support. Both shoes cater to different preferences, making the choice dependent on individual performance goals.

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is priced at $64.95, whereas the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 retails for $119.95. This makes the ASICS model approximately 46% cheaper than its Brooks counterpart. For budget-conscious consumers, the Gel-Contend 9 offers great value, especially for those who are new to running or looking for an everyday shoe.

While the Brooks model's features justify its higher price, those on a tighter budget may find the ASICS option more appealing without sacrificing too much in terms of quality. The price difference is a significant factor for many shoppers, particularly if they are looking for a reliable yet affordable running shoe.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the Brooks Women’s Ariel GTS 24 ultimately comes down to your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize comfort, breathability, and affordability, the ASICS model is a fantastic choice, priced at $64.95. However, if you require maximum support, stability, and advanced cushioning, the Brooks model, despite its higher price of $119.95, may be worth the investment. Your decision should reflect your running habits, budget, and the level of support you need during your activities.