ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes are priced at $64.95, making them about 17% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 Neutral Running Shoe, which retails for $114.95. This price difference could be significant for budget-conscious shoppers looking for quality running shoes. While both products deliver excellent features, the ASICS option is notably more accessible for those who want to prioritize cost without sacrificing performance.

Comfort Level

In terms of comfort, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 excels with its nitrogen-infused DNA Loft v3 cushioning, designed for supreme softness and responsiveness. This shoe is specifically crafted for runners seeking the ultimate in comfort, featuring a plush internal fit that adapts to your stride. On the other hand, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 also offers impressive comfort with its rearfoot GEL technology cushioning and Ortholite sockliner, which provides great step-in comfort. While both shoes focus on comfort, the Brooks option is positioned as the go-to for those who prioritize a plush experience.

Support and Stability

The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 delivers excellent support, especially for neutral runners, offering maximum cushioning that stabilizes the foot during runs. Additionally, it has been granted the APMA Seal of Acceptance, indicating its suitability for various activities from road running to cross-training. Comparatively, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 has features like synthetic stitching overlays for added support and flex grooves in the outsole for improved stability. While both shoes provide adequate support, the Brooks model is specifically designed for those needing extra cushioning and stability.

Breathability

Breathability is a strong point for both running shoes, but they approach it differently. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 features a jacquard mesh upper that enhances airflow, making it suitable for warmer conditions. In contrast, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 incorporates a newly engineered warp knit upper that is both breathable and flexible, ensuring a comfortable fit. While both models prioritize breathability, the ASICS shoe may be better for those who prefer a straightforward design that maximizes airflow.

Outsole Performance

When it comes to outsole performance, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 includes a synthetic rubber outsole with Trusstic Technology for enhanced stability across various terrains. Its design emphasizes flexibility, making it suitable for different running conditions. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 boasts a broad platform that promotes smooth heel-to-toe transitions for a soft experience while running. While both shoes offer effective outsoles, the Brooks model is engineered for a more stable and cushioned run.

Style and Design

In terms of aesthetics, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is available in a vibrant Lilac HINT/Bluebell color scheme that appeals to those looking for a stylish yet functional shoe. The Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21, on the other hand, features a more subdued Black/Grey/White design, which may attract runners who prefer a classic look. While personal preference will lead the choice in style, both models have their unique appeal based on color and design.

Sales Rank

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 holds a sales rank of 1155, indicating a strong presence in the market for running shoes. In comparison, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 has a sales rank of 29881, suggesting it is less popular among consumers. This difference in sales rank may point to a higher demand for the ASICS model, which could be attributed to its lower price and effective marketing.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the decision between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 21 depends on individual needs and preferences. If budget is a primary concern, the ASICS model stands out as a more affordable option without compromising on comfort and support. However, if supreme cushioning and plush comfort are your top priorities, the Brooks shoe may be worth the investment, despite its higher price. Both shoes offer excellent features tailored to different running needs, making them valuable options in the running shoe market.