ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is significantly more budget-friendly at $64.95, compared to the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23, which retails for $159.99. This price difference makes the ASICS about 59% cheaper than the Brooks model. For runners on a tight budget or those who are just starting their running journey, the Gel-Contend 9 offers a compelling value without sacrificing essential features. On the other hand, the Glycerin 23, while more expensive, aims to provide premium comfort and performance, positioning itself as a high-end option for serious runners.

Comfort and Cushioning

In terms of comfort, both shoes prioritize cushioning but approach it differently. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 features Rearfoot GEL technology that enhances impact absorption and provides a softer feeling upon footstrike. This shoe is designed to create a comfortable experience for daily wear and light running. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin 23 boasts upgraded nitrogen-infused DNA TUNED midsole cushioning, which includes 2mm more cushioning in the forefoot compared to its predecessor. This allows for softer landings and more responsive toe-offs, making it ideal for long runs and high-mileage training. Runners looking for plush comfort may find the Brooks to be a superior choice.

Fit and Upper Design

Fit is crucial for any running shoe, and both options offer distinct benefits in this area. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 has a jacquard mesh upper that enhances airflow, providing breathability during workouts. This design ensures that the foot remains cool and comfortable. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin 23 features a newly enhanced triple jacquard warp-knit upper that delivers a plush, comfortable fit with a bit more structure. This upper is also designed to reduce pressure points during extended wear, making the Glycerin a great option for longer distances. Runners who prioritize a snug yet soft fit may lean towards the Brooks model.

Versatility for Running

When it comes to versatility, both shoes cater to different types of runners. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is suited for casual runners and those new to the sport. Its design focuses on comfort and ease of use, making it a great choice for occasional jogs or walks. The Brooks Glycerin 23, however, is aimed at neutral runners seeking premium performance for daily training and recovery runs. Its features, including smooth transitions and a wide platform, allow it to handle various running conditions, making it the go-to option for dedicated runners. Therefore, the Glycerin offers greater versatility for those who plan to run consistently.

Breathability and Temperature Control

Breathability plays an essential role in maintaining comfort during runs. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9’s jacquard mesh upper allows for excellent airflow, helping to keep feet cool. This feature is beneficial for shorter runs or warmer weather. In comparison, the Brooks Glycerin 23’s engineered upper provides a foot-conforming fit that is breathable yet structured, ensuring comfort over longer periods. While both shoes provide breathability, the Glycerin’s design may offer better temperature control for serious runners who spend extended time on the road or trails.

Durability and Construction

Durability is a critical consideration for any running shoe, and both models take different approaches. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 utilizes a synthetic rubber outsole with Trusstic Technology that enhances stability across various terrains. This durability is essential for everyday runners. Meanwhile, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is designed with high-mileage comfort in mind, boasting a premium midsole package that balances softness with resilience. This makes it a robust choice for runners who frequently log substantial distances. Overall, while both shoes are durable, the Glycerin appears to be built for those who demand longevity and sturdiness in their footwear.

Brand Reputation and Sales Ranking

Brand reputation can influence purchasing decisions, and both ASICS and Brooks have solid standing in the running community. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 has a sales rank of 1155, marking it as a popular choice among consumers. The Brooks Glycerin 23, with a sales rank of 4982, also holds its own but is positioned a bit lower in the rankings. Both brands are known for quality, but ASICS' higher sales rank for the Gel-Contend 9 suggests it may have garnered more immediate favor among shoppers, especially those seeking budget-friendly options.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 23 comes down to your specific running needs and budget. If you are looking for an affordable option that provides decent comfort and is suitable for casual use, the ASICS is the clear winner at $64.95. However, if you are a serious runner willing to invest in a high-performance shoe designed for long distances and premium cushioning, the Brooks Glycerin 23 is worth the higher price of $159.99. Each shoe has its merits, so consider what features matter most to you before making a decision.