vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, wins on breathability and style, New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running wins on support and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers a more budget-friendly option with solid comfort, while the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 excels in advanced cushioning for serious runners.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better

Price

ASICS is $54.93 cheaper

Comfort

Good for casual runs

Sales Rank

Higher sales rank at 1155

Why New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running is better

Cushioning

Fresh Foam X provides superior comfort

Durability

Designed for long-distance running

Fit

Adjustable lace closure for secure fit

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,
75
New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running
CushioningRearfoot GELFresh Foam X
OutsoleSynthetic rubberDurable rubber
UpperJacquard meshSynthetic material
WeightLightweightLightweight
DropNot specified8 mm

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8,New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes are significantly cheaper than the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 Running Shoe, making them a more budget-friendly option. Priced at $64.95, the ASICS model is about 46% less than the New Balance shoes, which retail for $119.88. This price difference of approximately $54.93 means that if you're looking to save while still investing in quality running shoes, the ASICS option is the clear winner in terms of cost.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, both shoes offer impressive cushioning, but they do so in different ways. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 features Rearfoot GEL technology and an OrthoLite sockliner, which collectively enhance impact absorption and provide a soft feel during footstrike. This design is aimed at delivering comfort for runners who seek a gentle landing with every step. On the other hand, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 boasts an advanced Fresh Foam X midsole, which is touted as providing the most cushioned experience available. This shoe is engineered for superior comfort over long distances, making it a great option for serious runners who prioritize cushioning in their footwear.

Design and Aesthetics

In terms of design, both shoes present unique aesthetics that cater to different preferences. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 features a sleek polyester upper in a lilac and blue color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a softer, more feminine look. Meanwhile, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 comes in a more neutral black, phantom, and angora palette, which may appeal to those who prefer a classic and versatile running shoe. Both designs incorporate breathable materials to enhance airflow, but the choice between them may ultimately come down to personal taste and style preference.

Fit and Support

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is designed with a jacquard mesh upper that improves airflow and provides a comfortable fit. It also features synthetic stitching on the overlays that adds to the shoe's support, making it suitable for various foot shapes. Conversely, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 includes an adjustable lace closure that allows for a customizable fit, ensuring that the shoe stays securely in place during runs. While both shoes offer support, the ASICS model focuses on breathability and comfort, while the New Balance model emphasizes a secure, adjustable fit.

Durability and Traction

Durability is crucial for running shoes, and both models excel in this area, albeit with different technologies. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is built with a synthetic rubber outsole that incorporates Trusstic Technology, providing stability and durability on various terrains. In comparison, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 features a durable rubber outsole designed to withstand the rigors of long-distance running. Both shoes are crafted to endure wear and tear, but the choice may depend on the type of running you plan to do, whether it's on varied surfaces or consistent pavement.

Performance for Different Runners

The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is ranked 1155 in sales, indicating a solid performance among everyday runners who appreciate comfort and affordability. It caters well to those looking for a reliable shoe for casual runs or walks. In contrast, the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 holds a sales rank of 13111, suggesting it attracts a more specialized audience. This shoe is ideal for runners who prioritize advanced cushioning and are willing to invest in a higher-end product for serious training sessions or long-distance runs.

User Experience and Feedback

User feedback often highlights the importance of comfort and fit in running shoes, and both models have received positive remarks in these areas. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is praised for its excellent step-in comfort due to the OrthoLite sockliner, making it a favorite among casual runners. The New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14, however, is recognized for its exceptional cushioning that enhances the running experience, especially over longer distances. Ultimately, the choice may depend on the type of running experience you're seeking—casual comfort versus high-performance support.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the New Balance Women's Fresh Foam X 860 V14 depends largely on your budget and running style. If you're looking for a more affordable option with solid comfort for casual runs, the ASICS model at $64.95 offers excellent value. However, if you prioritize advanced cushioning and are ready to invest in a shoe engineered for serious training, the New Balance model is worth the $119.88 price tag. Ultimately, both shoes serve their purpose effectively, but your choice should align with your specific running needs and financial considerations.