ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, wins on price and sales rank, Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 wins on cushioning and durability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers great value and comfort for casual runners, while the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 excels in cushioning and performance for serious runners.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better
Price
ASICS is significantly cheaper at $64.95.
Sales Rank
ASICS has a better sales rank at 1,155.
Weight
ASICS is lighter, making it easier for casual use.
Why Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 is better
Cushioning
Saucony features premium PWRRUN+ foam for superior comfort.
Durability
Saucony has a high-abrasion rubber outsole for better grip.
Fit
Saucony's engineered mesh adapts better to foot shape.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, | Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker, Vapor/Moon, 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $64.95 | $119.95 |
| Cushioning | Rearfoot GEL | PWRRUN+ foam |
| Upper Material | Jacquard mesh | Engineered mesh |
| Outsole | Synthetic rubber | High-abrasion rubber |
| Sales Rank | 1155 | 34383 |
Dimension comparison
Overview of ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes are priced at $64.95, making them an attractive option for budget-conscious runners. This model is ranked 1,155 in sales, indicating solid popularity among users. The shoes feature Rearfoot GEL technology, which enhances impact absorption and provides a softer feel during footstrike. Furthermore, the jacquard mesh upper promotes airflow, ensuring breathability during runs. The combination of an OrthoLite sockliner and EVA insole contributes to excellent comfort, making these shoes suitable for both casual and serious runners.
Overview of Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker
The Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker is priced at $119.95, which is about 84% more expensive than the ASICS model. Despite its higher price, it holds a lower sales rank of 34,383, suggesting it's not as popular at the moment. Its standout feature is the PWRRUN+ foam that delivers maximum cushioning and superior shock absorption, ideal for long runs. The engineered mesh upper not only offers breathability but also adapts to the foot for a snug fit, reducing irritation during extended wear. This model is designed for neutral runners seeking both performance and style.
Comfort and Cushioning
When it comes to comfort, both models offer unique features designed to enhance the running experience. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 employs Rearfoot GEL technology and an EVA insole to provide cushioned support, ideal for casual jogging or walking. On the other hand, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 incorporates premium PWRRUN+ foam, which is engineered for maximum cushioning and energy return, making it particularly beneficial for long-distance runs. While the ASICS provides comfort at a lower price, the superior cushioning of the Saucony may justify its higher cost for serious runners.
Breathability and Fit
Breathability is critical in running shoes, and both the ASICS and Saucony models excel in this area. The ASICS features a jacquard mesh upper that improves airflow, ensuring your feet remain cool during runs. Conversely, the Saucony's breathable engineered mesh upper is designed to adapt to the foot, offering a secure fit that minimizes hot spots. While both shoes address breathability effectively, the adaptive fit of the Saucony may provide a slight edge for those who prioritize comfort during longer runs.
Durability and Outsole Performance
Durability is vital for any running shoe, and both models showcase features that support long-term use. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 includes a synthetic rubber outsole enhanced by Trusstic Technology, which promotes stability on various terrains. Meanwhile, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 boasts a high-abrasion rubber outsole, designed for reliable grip and long-lasting durability on pavement and urban surfaces. While both models are built for durability, the Saucony may offer better performance for runners who frequently tackle diverse environments.
Style and Aesthetics
Both the ASICS and Saucony models come in attractive colorways that appeal to different style preferences. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is available in a lilac hint/bluebell combination, providing a vibrant look that is both stylish and functional. The Saucony Women's Triumph 22, on the other hand, features a vapor/moon color scheme that offers a more modern and sleek appearance. While aesthetics is subjective, those who appreciate a bolder color may lean towards the ASICS, while others may prefer the understated elegance of the Saucony.
Price Consideration
Price is a significant factor in any purchasing decision, and the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 is priced at $64.95, making it an appealing option for those on a budget. In contrast, the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 retails for $119.95, which is about $55 more than the ASICS model. This price difference of approximately 84% may deter some buyers, especially if they are looking for a solid running shoe without the extra features. For casual runners or those new to the sport, the ASICS presents a more budget-friendly choice.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes and the Saucony Women's Triumph 22 Sneaker ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you're looking for an affordable, comfortable, and breathable option for casual running or walking, the ASICS is a strong contender at $64.95. However, if you're a serious runner seeking advanced cushioning and performance for long distances, the Saucony's premium features may justify its higher price of $119.95. Both models have their strengths, so consider your running habits and preferences before making a decision.

