ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, vs Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4,
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, leads on cushioning and durability.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 offers superior comfort and cushioning, making it a better choice for those prioritizing shock absorption. However, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is a more budget-friendly option.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, is better
Comfort
ASICS features rearfoot GEL technology for better shock absorption.
Breathability
ASICS has a jacquard mesh upper for enhanced airflow.
Durability
ASICS includes Trusstic Technology for improved stability.
Why Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, is better
Price
Under Armour is approximately 17% cheaper.
Weight
Under Armour is lighter at 10.05 oz.
Style
Under Armour offers a more neutral color palette.
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 Running Shoes, 8, | Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4, |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | ASICS | Under Armour |
| Model | Gel-Contend 9 | Charged Surge 4 |
| Upper | Jacquard Mesh | Breathable Mesh |
| Midsole | Rearfoot GEL | Charged Cushioning |
| Outsole | Synthetic Rubber | Rubber |
Dimension comparison
Price Comparison
When it comes to price, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is approximately 17% cheaper than the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9. Priced at $51.95, the Charged Surge 4 offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the Gel-Contend 9, which retails for $64.95. This price difference may be significant for budget-conscious shoppers looking for running shoes without compromising on quality. Despite the lower price, the Under Armour model still provides excellent features that cater to runners’ needs.
Comfort and Cushioning
Both running shoes emphasize comfort, but they approach it differently. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 features rearfoot GEL technology for improved impact absorption, which many runners appreciate for a softer footstrike. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is equipped with Charged Cushioning midsole technology that delivers all-day comfort along with responsiveness. While both provide a high level of comfort, the ASICS model highlights its GEL technology, making it particularly appealing for those prioritizing shock absorption during runs.
Fit and Support
In terms of fit and support, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 uses a jacquard mesh upper designed to enhance airflow, which is beneficial for breathability during long runs. The synthetic stitching on the overlays offers additional support, ensuring a secure fit. On the other hand, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 features a breathable mesh upper reinforced with synthetic overlays for added structure and support. Both shoes provide a solid fit, but the ASICS model might have a slight edge in breathability, making it better suited for warmer climates.
Weight and Performance
The Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is designed to be lightweight, weighing in at 10.05 oz, which can be advantageous for runners seeking agility and speed. In contrast, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 does not specify its weight, but it is generally known for being slightly heavier due to its additional cushioning features. This weight difference may influence performance, particularly for competitive runners who prefer a lighter shoe to enhance their speed and endurance on the track.
Durability
Durability is a crucial factor for runners, and both models exhibit features aimed at longevity. The ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 boasts a synthetic rubber outsole with Trusstic Technology, enhancing stability and ensuring the shoe stands up to various terrains. The Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 also emphasizes durability with its rubber outsole that provides traction and flexibility where needed. While both shoes appear durable, the ASICS model's specific mention of Trusstic Technology might be indicative of a design focused on extending the shoe's lifespan.
Style and Aesthetics
In terms of style, the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 comes in a Lilac HINT/Bluebell color combination, which may appeal to those looking for a stylish yet functional running shoe. Conversely, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 is available in a more neutral palette of White/Distant Gray/Metallic Silver. Both shoes offer attractive designs, but the choice ultimately depends on personal aesthetic preference. The ASICS model's bolder colors might attract runners looking to make a statement, while the Under Armour’s subtler tones could appeal to those seeking a classic look.
Brand Reputation
Both ASICS and Under Armour have strong reputations in the athletic footwear industry. ASICS, known for its focus on comfort and performance, has a bestseller rank of 1155, indicating a solid level of popularity among consumers. Meanwhile, the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 holds a slightly lower bestseller rank of 2697, which suggests it may be less favored compared to the ASICS model. This difference in sales rank could influence buyer confidence, particularly for those who place value on brand reputation and peer recommendations when purchasing running shoes.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Contend 9 and the Under Armour Women's Charged Surge 4 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize comfort and cushioning, especially with an emphasis on shock absorption, the ASICS model may be the better choice despite its higher price. However, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that still offers solid support and durability, the Under Armour model stands out as a compelling alternative. Consider your running style, preferences for fit, and budget to make the best decision for your athletic needs.

