vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on price and weight, Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - wins on brand and cushioning.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers a more budget-friendly option with excellent cushioning, while the Brooks Glycerin 22 provides advanced technology and a strong brand reputation.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better

Price

ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 is cheaper at $109.95.

Weight

Gel-Cumulus 27 is noted as the lightest model.

Cushioning

Offers good cushioning with PureGEL technology.

Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe - is better

Brand Reputation

Brooks Glycerin 22 has a higher bestseller rank.

Cushioning Technology

Features advanced DNA Tuned technology.

Fit

Double jacquard knit upper provides better adaptability.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,
78
Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
85

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -
Current Price$109.95$114.95
Sales Rank8263844
Cushioning TechFF BLAST PLUSDNA Tuned
Upper MaterialEngineered MeshDouble Jacquard Knit
Support TypeNeutralNeutral

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5,Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 Neutral Running Shoe -

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is priced at $109.95, making it about 6% cheaper than the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22, which costs $114.95. This price difference may influence buyers looking for a budget-friendly running shoe option. While both shoes offer advanced cushioning technologies, the lower price of the Gel-Cumulus 27 could be appealing for those who want quality without breaking the bank.

Brand Reputation

ASICS and Brooks are both reputable brands in the running shoe market, with dedicated followings. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 has a bestseller rank of 8263, indicating a solid level of popularity. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin 22 has a significantly higher bestseller rank of 844, suggesting a stronger market presence. This could indicate that more runners trust the Glycerin 22 for their needs, potentially influencing buyers who prioritize brand recognition and consumer trust.

Cushioning Technology

The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 features FF BLAST PLUS technology and PureGEL technology, which together provide lightweight cushioning and responsive rebound. This combination focuses on impact absorption and softer landings, making it a suitable choice for those seeking added comfort during runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin 22 utilizes DNA Tuned technology, which integrates dual-size cells for luxurious cushioning and energetic toe-offs. While both shoes offer excellent cushioning, the Glycerin 22 may provide a more dynamic feel due to its advanced technology.

Fit and Comfort

In terms of fit, the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 has an engineered mesh upper designed to enhance breathability and comfort, catering to those who prioritize a snug yet breathable fit. Conversely, the Brooks Glycerin 22 boasts a newly engineered double jacquard knit upper, providing a flexible and accommodating fit with exceptional durability. This could be particularly advantageous for runners with wider feet or those who prefer a more adaptable shoe structure. Thus, comfort may vary based on individual foot shape and preferences.

Weight and Performance

The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 is noted as the lightest and most padded model in its series, which may appeal to runners who desire a lightweight shoe that still offers ample cushioning. While the specific weight of each shoe is not provided, the emphasis on lightweight performance in the Gel-Cumulus suggests that it may be better suited for long-distance runners looking to maintain speed. The Brooks Glycerin 22, with its focus on smooth transitions and stability, is likely to perform well in various running scenarios, but specific weight advantages remain unclear without detailed specifications.

Aesthetic Appeal

Aesthetics can play a significant role in a runner's choice of footwear. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 comes in a sleek Black/Concrete colorway, which may appeal to those who prefer a more understated look. In contrast, the Brooks Glycerin 22 features a more vibrant combination of White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue, appealing to runners who enjoy a pop of color in their gear. This aesthetic difference could influence buyers who value style alongside functionality.

Intended Use

Both the ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Glycerin 22 are designed for neutral support, making them suitable for road running and cross-training. However, the Brooks Glycerin 22 is specifically noted for being a certified PDAC A5500 Diabetic shoe, which can be a critical factor for buyers with specific health considerations. This certification may make the Glycerin 22 a more attractive option for those prioritizing health-related features in their running shoes.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, the choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin 22 comes down to individual preferences and priorities. If you're looking for a more budget-friendly option with excellent cushioning, the Gel-Cumulus 27 may be the right fit at $109.95. However, if you prioritize brand recognition, advanced cushioning technology, and a shoe that accommodates a wider foot, the Brooks Glycerin 22 at $114.95 could be worth the extra investment. Consider your specific running needs to make the best decision for your next pair of running shoes.