ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, vs Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running
Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, wins on price, Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running wins on support and fit.
The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 offers lightweight cushioning at a better price, while the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 excels in support and stability.
Why ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, is better
Price
ASICS is $5 cheaper
Weight
Lighter shoe for speed
Cushioning
Focus on lightweight comfort
Why Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running is better
Support
GuideRails support system
Stability
Better for various activities
Fit
Flexible and accommodating upper
Overall score
Specifications
| Spec | ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 Running Shoes, 8.5, | Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 Supportive Running |
|---|---|---|
| Technology | FF BLAST PLUS | DNA Tuned |
| Upper | Engineered mesh | Double jacquard knit |
| Sales Rank | 8263 | 2097 |
| Color | Black/Concrete | White/Limpet Shell/Amparo Blue |
| Cushion Type | Soft | Plush |
Dimension comparison
Introduction to ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22
When it comes to choosing the right running shoe, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 are two popular contenders. Both shoes offer unique features designed for comfort and performance, catering to different running preferences. The Gel-Cumulus 27 is priced at $109.95, while the Glycerin GTS 22 costs $114.95, making the ASICS about 4% cheaper.
Cushioning and Comfort
Cushioning is a critical factor for runners, and both shoes excel in this area. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 features FF BLAST PLUS technology, which provides lightweight impact absorption and a responsive feel. Additionally, the PureGEL technology enhances softness and shock absorption, making it a great choice for those seeking plush comfort during their runs. On the other hand, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 incorporates DNA Tuned technology, which blends dual-size cells for a luxurious cushioning experience. It also offers GuideRails support to stabilize the foot and promote smooth transitions. Thus, while the Gel-Cumulus 27 focuses on lightweight cushioning, the Glycerin GTS 22 emphasizes a balance of cushioning and stability.
Fit and Breathability
The fit and breathability of a running shoe can greatly influence your running experience. The Gel-Cumulus 27 features an engineered mesh upper, designed to improve breathability and comfort. This construction allows for better airflow, keeping your feet cooler during runs. In contrast, the Glycerin GTS 22 boasts a double jacquard knit upper that provides a flexible and accommodating fit while maintaining durability. This design enhances breathability but prioritizes a snug fit. Overall, both shoes offer good breathability, but the ASICS may slightly edge out in terms of airflow due to its engineered mesh design.
Support and Stability
Support is essential, especially for those who require a little extra help during their runs. The Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 shines in this category with its innovative GuideRails support system, designed to keep excess motion in check and support the natural motion path of the foot. This holistic support makes it ideal for various activities, from road running to gym workouts. The ASICS Gel-Cumulus 27, while comfortable and cushioned, does not emphasize support in the same way. Its focus is primarily on cushioning rather than rigid support structures. Therefore, if you prioritize support, the Glycerin GTS 22 is the better option.
Weight and Performance
Weight can significantly impact running performance, especially for long-distance runners. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is known for being one of the lightest and most padded models in its line, providing comfort without weighing you down. This makes it an excellent option for those looking to maintain speed during their runs. In contrast, while the Brooks Glycerin GTS 22 offers plush cushioning, it may feel slightly heavier due to its robust support features. Therefore, if you're aiming for a lightweight shoe that enhances speed, the Gel-Cumulus 27 may be more suitable.
Style and Aesthetics
Both shoes come in attractive designs, catering to different style preferences. The ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is available in a sleek Black/Concrete color scheme, appealing to those who prefer a classic look. Meanwhile, the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 features a more vibrant combination of White, Limpet Shell, and Amparo Blue, which may attract those looking for a more eye-catching shoe. Ultimately, your choice may come down to personal aesthetic preference, as both styles have their unique appeal.
Pricing and Value
When it comes to pricing, the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 is listed at $109.95, making it more budget-friendly compared to the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22, which retails for $114.95. This $5 price difference represents about a 4% savings with the ASICS model. Given that both shoes offer excellent features, the Gel-Cumulus 27 provides considerable value for those seeking quality without breaking the bank. However, if you need the additional support offered by the Glycerin GTS 22, the slight price increase may be justified.
Which should you buy?
Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Cumulus 27 and the Brooks Women’s Glycerin GTS 22 ultimately depends on your specific needs as a runner. If you prioritize lightweight cushioning and a more budget-friendly option, the Gel-Cumulus 27 is an excellent choice. However, if support and stability are your primary concerns, especially for longer runs or various training activities, the Glycerin GTS 22 is worth the investment. Both shoes cater to different preferences, ensuring that every runner can find an option that suits their style and comfort requirements.

