vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark vs ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark wins on comfort and weight, ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White wins on price and stability.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers better value and comfort for casual runners, while the GT-2000 13 excels in stability for serious runners.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better

Price

Gel-Excite 11 is $25 cheaper than GT-2000 13.

Cushioning

Gel-Excite 11 features advanced cushioning technologies.

Sales Rank

Gel-Excite 11 has a better sales rank (2352 vs 9491).

Why ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White is better

Stability

GT-2000 13 has a 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM for better stability.

Sustainability

GT-2000 13 uses recycled materials in its upper.

Support

GT-2000 13 is designed for serious runners needing support.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
85
ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
78

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White
CushioningFF BLAST PLUS, AMPLIFOAM PLUSRearfoot PureGEL
Upper MaterialEngineered meshJacquard mesh
Sales Rank23529491
SustainabilityNoYes
Target AudienceCasual runnersSerious runners

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, 8.5, Black/White

Price Comparison

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes are priced at $74.95, making them about 25% cheaper than the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe, which costs $99.95. This price difference might be significant for budget-conscious buyers looking for quality running shoes. While both shoes come from a reputable brand, the lower price of the Gel-Excite 11 could offer a more appealing option for those who want to try a new pair without a significant financial commitment.

Comfort and Cushioning

When it comes to comfort, the Gel-Excite 11 features FF BLAST PLUS cushioning and AMPLIFOAM PLUS cushioning, which promise a soft and responsive ride. This shoe's design focuses on providing underfoot comfort, making it suitable for casual runners and fitness enthusiasts. On the other hand, the GT-2000 13 incorporates Rearfoot PureGEL technology and a sockliner designed for lightweight cushioning. While both shoes prioritize comfort, the Gel-Excite 11 may offer a more plush experience due to its emphasis on cushioning technologies.

Upper Material

The Gel-Excite 11 boasts an engineered mesh upper that enhances breathability and reduces the need for overlays. This design ensures a lightweight feel while maintaining comfort during runs. Conversely, the GT-2000 13 features a jacquard mesh upper, which provides a supportive foothold. Notably, at least 50% of the upper material in the GT-2000 13 is made from recycled content, making it a more environmentally friendly choice. Therefore, if sustainability is a priority for you, the GT-2000 13 stands out in this category.

Stability Features

Stability is crucial for runners, and here the GT-2000 13 excels with its 3D GUIDANCE SYSTEM that offers advanced stability for smoother strides. This feature is particularly beneficial for those who overpronate or require additional support during their runs. The Gel-Excite 11, while comfortable, does not feature a dedicated stability system, which may make it less suitable for runners needing extra support. Thus, if stability is a concern, the GT-2000 13 would be the preferable option.

Weight and Design

Weight can significantly affect running performance, and the Gel-Excite 11 is designed to be light and breathable, allowing for quicker strides. The GT-2000 13, while still comfortable, may weigh slightly more due to its stability features and additional cushioning. However, both shoes are designed with aesthetics in mind, with the Gel-Excite 11 showcasing a vibrant Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow color scheme alongside the more classic Black/White of the GT-2000 13. Depending on personal style preferences, buyers may find one design more appealing than the other.

Target Audience

The Gel-Excite 11 caters to casual runners and fitness enthusiasts looking for a comfortable shoe that emphasizes cushioning without breaking the bank. Its versatile design makes it suitable for various activities beyond running, such as gym workouts or walking. In contrast, the GT-2000 13 is tailored for serious runners who require enhanced stability and support. This shoe's advanced features make it ideal for those who log significant mileage or participate in more intense training regimens.

Sales Rank Insights

In terms of sales rank, the Gel-Excite 11 is currently ranked 2,352, while the GT-2000 13 has a sales rank of 9,491. The higher sales rank of the Gel-Excite 11 indicates its popularity and demand among consumers. This could suggest that buyers prefer the Gel-Excite 11 for its combination of comfort and price. However, the GT-2000 13's advanced features may attract a different segment of buyers who are specifically looking for stability and support.

Which should you buy?

Ultimately, your choice between the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes and the ASICS Women's GT-2000 13 Running Shoe should hinge on your specific needs and preferences. If you're after a more economical option that prioritizes comfort and lightweight design, the Gel-Excite 11 is the clear winner at $74.95. However, if you require additional stability and are willing to invest more for features that support serious running, the GT-2000 13, priced at $99.95, is worth considering. Each shoe has its strengths, making it essential to align your choice with your running style and budget.