vsversusfinder

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark vs Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,

Updated August 2026 — ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark wins on cushioning and comfort, Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, wins on style.

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 offers superior cushioning and is specifically designed for running, while the Nike Women's Revolution 8 is a more affordable and versatile option.

Why ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark is better

Cushioning

ASICS features advanced cushioning technologies.

Sales Rank

ASICS has a strong reputation in running shoes.

Breathability

ASICS has engineered mesh for better airflow.

Why Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, is better

Price

Nike is priced lower at $60.

Versatility

Nike is suitable for casual wear.

Weight

Nike is lighter and easier to wear.

Overall score

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, Dark
85
Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
75

Specifications

SpecASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkNike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,
BrandASICSNike
ModelGel-Excite 11Revolution 8
UpperEngineered MeshBreathable Mesh
MidsoleFF BLAST PLUSFoam
OutsoleFLUIDRIDEIntuitive Design

Dimension comparison

ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes, 8, DarkNike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes,

Price Comparison

When comparing the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 Running Shoes and the Nike Women's Revolution 8 Road Running Shoes, the Nike option is about 20% cheaper, priced at $60.00 compared to ASICS's $74.95. This significant price difference may influence budget-conscious buyers seeking quality running shoes without a hefty investment. While both shoes are designed for comfort and performance, the lower price of the Nike makes it a more attractive option for those looking to save on their athletic gear.

Brand Reputation

Both ASICS and Nike have established themselves as reputable brands in the athletic footwear market. ASICS, known for its focus on running shoes and technologies to enhance performance, ranks 2,352 in sales. Meanwhile, Nike, a global leader in sportswear, holds a better sales rank at 1,608. This suggests that Nike may be more popular among consumers currently, which could be a deciding factor for shoppers who prioritize brand recognition and market presence.

Comfort and Cushioning

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 features several advanced cushioning technologies, including FF BLAST PLUS and AMPLIFOAM PLUS, which promise a softer ride and better responsiveness. This shoe is designed for those who value a plush underfoot feel during runs. In contrast, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 offers a foam midsole that provides a comfortable, cushioned experience, complemented by a rocker geometry to enhance natural movement. For runners who prioritize cushioning, the ASICS may have the edge due to its multiple cushioning layers, while Nike offers a solid alternative that still emphasizes comfort.

Breathability

Breathability is essential in running shoes, especially for longer runs. The ASICS shoe features an engineered mesh upper, designed to be lightweight and reduce overlays, which enhances airflow and comfort. The Nike Revolution 8 also boasts a breathable mesh upper, which is said to be more breathable than its predecessor, the Revolution 7. While both shoes excel in breathability, the ASICS model may provide slightly better ventilation due to its engineered mesh design that specifically aims to improve airflow.

Outsole Performance

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11's FLUIDRIDE outsole is engineered to create smoother strides, which is crucial for runners looking for a seamless transition during their runs. On the other hand, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 features an intuitive outsole design with flex grooves, which enhances comfort and cushioning with each step. While both outsoles are designed for performance, the ASICS may offer a slight advantage for runners seeking a smoother running experience, whereas the Nike model focuses on flexibility and comfort.

Aesthetic Appeal

Aesthetics can play a significant role in a runner's choice of shoes. The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is available in a striking Dark Pink Clay/Orange Glow color scheme, appealing to those who prefer vibrant and bold designs. In contrast, the Nike Women's Revolution 8 comes in a more classic Black/White-Iron Grey combination, which may attract buyers looking for versatility in their footwear. Ultimately, the choice between these two designs will depend on personal style preferences, with ASICS leaning towards bold colors and Nike offering a more understated look.

Usage Versatility

The ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 is designed for both running and general fitness routines, making it a versatile option for active lifestyles. Its comfortable design and cushioning technologies cater to various activities. The Nike Women's Revolution 8, while primarily a running shoe, is also suitable for casual wear, thanks to its stylish appearance and comfortable fit. For users seeking a shoe that can transition seamlessly between running and everyday wear, the Nike may offer more versatility, while the ASICS is tailored more specifically for running and fitness activities.

Which should you buy?

Choosing between the ASICS Women's Gel-Excite 11 and the Nike Women's Revolution 8 ultimately depends on individual preferences and needs. If budget is a primary concern, the Nike offers a more affordable option at $60.00, making it attractive to cost-conscious buyers. Conversely, if you seek advanced cushioning and a shoe specifically designed for running, the ASICS, with its superior technology and features, may be worth the extra investment at $74.95. Consider your priorities in terms of comfort, brand reputation, and aesthetics to make the best decision for your running needs.